Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China Airlines plane bursts into flame at Okinawa airport

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:31 PM
Original message
China Airlines plane bursts into flame at Okinawa airport
Source: NHK news - Japan

A China Airlines 737 jet is on fire at Naha airport in Okinawa. The local branch of China Airlines in Naha says the plane, flight number 120, carrying 155 passengers, left Taipei this morning. It was scheduled to arrive at Naha at 10:45 AM. An air traffic controller at Naha airport says all 155 passengers have been safely evacuated. The local fire department in Naha is trying to determine whether any crew members are still in the plane. It says all the passengers have been safely evacuated. The National Police Agency says a fire broke out at the engine-room of the China Airlines plane after it made a landing at Naha airport and all the passengers had left the plane.

Read more: http://www.nhk.or.jp/english/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Commercial Airliners have 'engine rooms' ?

Sounds like a bit of a translation issue there .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maq Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Left Engine caught fire three minutes after landing
according to the scrolling news. six crew members may still be on board. All passengers were evacuated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Perhaps they meant inside the wing?
Puzzling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. The original Japanese language article just mentions "engine"
The translator just made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerceptionManagement Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. The Station Chief FUed and left the timing of the bomb to subordinates
No guess who the target was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. Larger commercial aircraft have rooms below that allow access to various computer systems.
It's a bit cramped and there's a particular name for it, but "engine room" can be understood to be the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can't the Chinese do ANYTHING right these days?
Geeze!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Seems not. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I hate to tell you, but Boeing isn't Chinese...
The cause of this incident remains to be seen, but there's just as much chance that the fault is American as Chinese.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. There are two manufacturers of engines for the 73....
Rolls-Royce and GE. I don't know what engine was selected for this particular aircraft, but Boeing does not build them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. 737 Engines
Actually all 737 engines are all made by CFM International (Owned by GE & Seneca) except the 737-100 (no longer in use) & 737-200 (retiring rapidly) which are exclusively Pratt & Whitney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mallard Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. That sounds more like it
China Airlines has all American engines on their Boeings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. That's right....
...I forgot about the really, really, really old ones. That's the problem with having the 73NG on one's mind all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. Snecma
Not Seneca

It was a 737-800 series, brand new, with winglets.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. " . . . just as much chance that the fault is American as Chinese."
Arguably, the same thing can be said about the state of our economy, particularly wealth inequity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yeah - maybe they should stop buying Boeing aircraft . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. If Boeing aircraft commonly exploded on the runway then you would have a point...
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 11:25 PM by SayWhatYo
I mean, if a American Airlines had an airbus engine explode on the run way, it would be just as ignorant to say that they should stop using airbus' products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. China Airlines is the Taiwanese airline
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 10:44 PM by Lydia Leftcoast
The one from the PRC is Air China.

However, the Taiwanese China Airlines has had a terrible safety record over the years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. In 1994, they had a terrible accident at Nagoya, Japan
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 12:15 AM by Art_from_Ark
As the plane was coming in for a landing, the 28-year-old pilot pulled the nose up too much and the plane started to climb at a steep angle until it stalled, then fell to the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mallard Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Accident in Nagoya was repeated on a returm flight from Bali in Feb '98
There were both times pilot errors involving a dispute in the cockpit following decision to abort landings for a go-around.

Both times the automated abort landing routine was initiated by the pilot and then the co-pilot went and shut off the auto pilot anyhow.

I was once told Arnold Schwarzenegger might be able to keep the nose down in that scenario when the Airbus' controls go back to manual, and that a French Airbus safety test pilot had been required to try this once and barely managed to regain control - as only an ace pilot could!

Twice was more than a bit of an insult to those who perished. Taipei has meantime tried hard to shake a bad reputation, but with more bad luck - this one don't any help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. At Nagoya, the 28-year-old was the co-pilot
not the pilot, as I had originally written. You are right, there was some sort of disagreement between the two about how to land, the co-pilot tried his way, and it ended up being the wrong way.

They were lucky this time that it was only a short hop (a little more than a hour) from Taipei to Naha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. here's a great pic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Here's a pic of them putting out the fire
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 12:13 AM by Art_from_Ark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. And here's a pic of the burned out hulk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. The passengers had NOT left the plane.
I just saw the footage on GMA. They did all make it off, thank goodness, using the emergency chutes. That would have been scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. video up on yahoo - scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. That is scary.
The pilots made it out just as the plane exploded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC