Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge's secret ruling curbed spy program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:08 PM
Original message
Judge's secret ruling curbed spy program
Source: Seattle Times from Washington Post

WASHINGTON — A federal intelligence-court judge earlier this year secretly declared a key element of the Bush administration's wiretapping efforts illegal, according to a lawmaker and government sources, providing a previously unstated rationale for fevered efforts by lawmakers this week to expand the president's spying powers.

....

The judge, whose name could not be learned, concluded early this year that the government had overstepped its authority in attempting to broadly monitor communications between two locations overseas that are passed through routing stations in the United States, said two other government sources familiar with the decision.

....

Under the revision the administration is pressing Congress to approve this week, the attorney general would have sole authority to authorize the warrantless surveillance of people "reasonably believed to be outside the United States" and to compel telecommunications carriers to turn over the information in real time or after it has been stored.

Democrats this week offered a proposal that also would expand the government's wiretapping authority but would keep it under FISA court supervision. The authority would expire in six months.

Read more: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003819342_spying03.html



This explains the desperation from the WH today. Of course, there's more that we don't know but have well-founded suspicions about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The government keeps sliding towards a 'possible cause' standard.
Instead of 'probable cause'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. In a related story, Bush thinks he can order congress around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. He might be able to keep them in session
but I don't believe he can force them to pass something they don't want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes but they're big fat wussies and will dance to the boy king's orders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And they did
They sold the American people down the toilet because they lack the courage and belief in their own agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polemicist Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Congress needs to get this done....
And revise the FISA laws appropriately and responsibly, mindful of our civil rights, but also mindful of utilizing all the tools available to monitor threats and fight terrorism. Asking Congress to revise FISA is what should have been done originally by the radical Bush Administration, back in late 2001 and early 2002. But Bush/Cheney always tries first to push the envelope of Executive power with the maximum secrecy. So they left Congress out of the loop and did whatever they wanted.

And now, after what appears to be a lot of back stage maneuvering and legal questioning, we are finally going to have Congress, the proper legal authority on this question, address these privacy and technological concerns. Let's not be hasty and accuse Democrats of capitulating. They fought for 6 years to force Bush to submit his spying to Congress for approval. It's a victory just to be at this point.

But we can't accept Gonzales or any other Attorney General as the solitary point person for this program. It must remain with a FISA court and a Federal Judge. The oversight must be outside the Executive branch. Democrats can't cave on that point, no matter the pressure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I was trying not to be hasty...
but, you understand, a certain amount of suspicion is warranted under the present circumstances.

We lost a point of leverage in the form of the August recess. I hope we get another. The Iowa caucuses are in less than six months, and having the AG in charge of eavesdropping privacy during the run-up means they can manipulate opinion and pre-empt our initiatives, perhaps even choosing our candidate for us. We MUST impeach Gonzales, and as you say, balance the oversight, well in advance of January, or the nation could be in for eight more years of hiding unspeakable crimes behind the flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bush does order Congress around and
Congress bows down to him, Bush gets everything he wants whenever he wants it. Most of Congress bows to Bush. I guess they need their vacation and pay raise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC