Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

War Bill Delays Minimum Wage Hike (they are attached to each other)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 10:25 AM
Original message
War Bill Delays Minimum Wage Hike (they are attached to each other)
Source: ap




War Bill Delays Minimum Wage Hike

By JESSE J. HOLLAND
The Associated Press
Monday, April 30, 2007; 4:13 AM

WASHINGTON -- Increasing the minimum wage should be easy for a Congress controlled by Democrats, especially with President Bush's pledge of support.

But a $2.10 boost for America's lowest-paid workers is again being delayed, this time in a tussle over whether to pull U.S. troops out of Iraq.



It's been 10 years since the last minimum wage increase, and boosting it from $5.15 to $7.25 per hour over the next two years was a key element of Democrats' midterm election platform. They even added a sweetener for Republicans: $4.8 billion in tax cuts for small businesses over 10 years.

But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., decided to attach the minimum wage provisions to the Iraq war spending bill. Normally that's must-pass legislation. Now it's certain to be the subject of Bush's second veto after Democrats loaded it up with a timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/30/AR2007043000151.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are in no way connected
but just happen to be on Stupid's desk at roughly the same time.

If Stupid holds a minimum wage hostage to keeping his war going so he can dump it into the lap of some Democrat at the cost of hundreds of US lives and thousands of Iraqi lives, this should be trumpeted all over the place.

The Democrats are truly spineless fools if they don't shop this one around to the networks. Getting impolite is just what is required here and getting impolite will attract the attention of the corrupt media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is an AMENDMENT to the emergency spending bill
Not two independent bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Should have been by itself
Now it seems like they are playing politics with what is an important bill to a lot of people. This, plus giving in to the pharmacy industry on bargaining for cheaper medicare drugs, looks like the old Republican way of screwing the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think the reason was that only 51 votes were needed to
pass the emergency spending bill, but a sepeperate bill would have been subject to filibuster - so it would need 60 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. What a stupid move...
to attach it to the Iraq bill. I'm sorry, I'm all for both of these bills, but this reeks of carelessness and self-centeredness.

Why on earth would we gamble something important like this, just to watch it be vetoed? For votes? To make Bush look worse than he already does?

Let's not kid ourselves- when this bill gets vetoed, it's going to be all about Iraq in the news and not about the minimum wage.

I hope it was worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Just a wee bit of a clarification
It wasn't the "Iraq bill" but a Supplemental Appropriations Bill put together by the House Appropriations Committee in charge stuff like balancing the budget.

So it only makes sense that a Supplemental Appropriations Bill would address all the financial issues possible unitl the next full budget or supplemental. Financial issues like putting strings on a small business tax credit (increase in the minimum wage) as well as putting strings on more money for the Iraq Invasion (a timetable).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Loaded it up with a timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops" ...
could the Washington Post use any more volatile language?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrick404 Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is this really that unusual?
Aren't most bills amalgams of issues as part of a legislative give and take? Seems that this is quite commonplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It is common, but it is also stupid.
Attaching the min wage bill, which * would love to veto but politically cannot, to the funding bill which he has already sworn he will veto, just gives him another reason to veto the min wage bill. Min wage is NOT the kind of legislation which is going to force him to pass the otherwise unpassable funding bill. The funding bill is going to allow him to veto the otherwise unvetoable min wage bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrick404 Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good pt
thanks for the clarification
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armodem08 Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. On the flip side, (but I do agree with you)
Bush's veto of the minimum wage bill might cause Americans to dislike him even more than if had just vetoed the Iraq bill. Political suicide to the 2nd degree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Personally, I think he revels in it.
Like a shooter going for the most casualties so he'll get in the history books, * is aiming to leave office with 20% or less - so he will never be forgotten. Suicide, maybe, but he can take us all down with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bull shit, screw you corporate whores on both sides of the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC