Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(WP reporter Walter) Pincus Tags Fleischer As Leak Source

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:47 AM
Original message
(WP reporter Walter) Pincus Tags Fleischer As Leak Source

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6410888,00.html

Pincus Tags Fleischer As Leak Source

WASHINGTON (AP) - Former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer leaked the identity of a CIA operative to Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus during a 2003 phone call, Pincus testified Monday as the first defense witness in the CIA leak trial.

Pincus was one of the first reporters to learn the identity of Valerie Plame, the wife of former ambassador and prominent Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson. Pincus said he learned her identity July 12, 2003 but did not immediately write about it. Plame was outed by syndicated columnist Robert Novak two days later.

Pincus testified on behalf of Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis ``Scooter'' Libby. Libby is accused of lying and obstructing the investigation into the leak of Plame's identity.

Pincus, a veteran national security reporter, said he was talking to Fleischer for a story about weapons of mass destruction. He said Fleischer ``suddenly swerved off'' topic and asked why Pincus continued to write about Wilson.

``Don't you know his wife works for the CIA as an analyst?'' Pincus recalled Fleischer saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Note to Libby Lawyers: Review the charges
Scooter lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. more from the article:
<snip>

Fleischer testified at the trial earlier that Libby had told him about Plame over lunch. Fleischer testified he leaked the information to three reporters during a presidential trip to Africa but he did not mention the Pincus conversation. In exchange for his testimony, prosecutors promised not to charge Fleischer.

Libby argues that he never discussed Plame with Fleischer. Pincus' testimony helps defense attorneys make the argument that Fleischer needed someone to blame to cover up his own leaking.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Am I reading this incorrectly, or are they start to turn on each other? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. first Rove now Fleischer... everyman for himself, well Libby is also
watching out for Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. That's silly because
Edited on Mon Feb-12-07 12:07 PM by Norquist Nemesis
Fleischer would have been charged if that were the case. Which article/author was it the Cheney said was "the best source"? Wasn't that Pincus?

eta: Nevermind. It was Weekly Standard. Too many Cons to keep track of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know how that info could help Libby
He committed perjury regardless of how many White House insiders told reporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't see how that helps Libby. Can anyone explain? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. heres is the explanation that the paper gives:



....Fleischer testified at the trial earlier that Libby had told him about Plame over lunch. Fleischer testified he leaked the information to three reporters during a presidential trip to Africa but he did not mention the Pincus conversation. In exchange for his testimony, prosecutors promised not to charge Fleischer.

Libby argues that he never discussed Plame with Fleischer. Pincus' testimony helps defense attorneys make the argument that Fleischer needed someone to blame to cover up his own leaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It Doesn't, Libby Has No Defense
So they are trying to change the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. aka, "swerving off topic"
Edited on Mon Feb-12-07 03:35 PM by tanyev
The one skill each and every one of them have mastered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I haven't followed this closely.
Edited on Mon Feb-12-07 12:40 PM by igil
Here are two possibilities:

1. Fleischer is a prosecution witness. This serves to undermine him: First, Fleischer didn't tell the entire truth; second, Fleischer had a motive to misrepresent things.

2. Fitzgerald has motive to show that the Plame outing was intentional, if not part of a conspiracy. He introduced Wilson's column at the beginning of the trial in order to show that the WH, Libby included, had a motive to make sure Mr. Wilson was a target, and that this provides a motive for making Wilson nee Plame a target. As a target, references to her are not inconsequential, and therefore aren't likely to be incidental and easily forgettable.

After all, Libby's defense is that he said something false, which is necessary, but not sufficient, to show that he lied/committed perjury--which involves *knowingly* false statements.

I still wish they would make clear the distinction between the signified and the signifying (to use Jakobson's terminology). Valerie Wilson = Valerie Plame = Joe Wilson's wife, but the words used matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's not a leak trial. If Libby leaked to Fleisher and then said oh say...
I heard it from various reporters as if it was new...

...Then that's a big fat bit of perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. AP: Pincus reveals Fleischer as leak source


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070212/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cia_leak_trial;_ylt=Aj2e17agSKePmqJbcRY..Xms0NUE

Pincus reveals Fleischer as leak source

By MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writer 26 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Former White House press secretary
Ari Fleischer leaked the identity of a
CIA operative to Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus during a 2003 phone call, Pincus testified Monday as the first defense witness in the CIA leak trial.


Pincus was one of the first reporters to learn the identity of
Valerie Plame, the wife of former ambassador and prominent
Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson. Pincus said he learned her identity July 12, 2003 but did not immediately write about it. Plame was outed by syndicated columnist Robert Novak two days later.

Pincus testified on behalf of Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Libby is accused of lying and obstructing the investigation into the leak of Plame's identity.

Pincus, a veteran national security reporter, said he was talking to Fleischer for a story about weapons of mass destruction. He said Fleischer "suddenly swerved off" topic and asked why Pincus continued to write about Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC