Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Says Rove Denies Calling Evangelicals "Nuts"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 02:56 PM
Original message
White House Says Rove Denies Calling Evangelicals "Nuts"

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003254229

White House Says Rove Denies Calling Evangelicals "Nuts"

NEW YORK Today's press briefing by White House Press Secretary Tony Snow was his first since the leaks from a new book appeared, carrying revelations about the allegedly cynical use of the religious right by the White House for political gain. It quotes Karl Rove calling evangelical leaders "nuts," among many other hot charges.

The book is by a former top staffer at the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, David Kuo, and is called, "Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction."

Naturally Snow was asked about all this early on. He replied, "we've asked Karl, did you say the things attributed to you? He said, no." He added that Rove explained, "these are my friends, I don't talk about them like that." Snow labeled "false" the reports that the president did not take faith-based initiatives very seriously, and denied any political twists.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh-huh. Right.
What else could they say? Wouldn't be prudent to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Basic rule of politics: make the SOB deny it. Amusing.
Now what else can we accuse him of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
54. I got it!
Next question for him, "A Secret Service agent said it was Karl Rove that gay male hooker Jeff Gannon visited over 200 times. How does the president feel about his closest aide being involved with Gannon?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
61. EXACTLY! How does it feel KKKarl?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
73. I'm beginning to like the newspaper headlines.
Rove: "I'm not a pigfucker". :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
112. OH my, if he didn't poppy Bush sure called them worse.
I'm checking now on some quotes attributed to GH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
74. figures that the creep admits that he is a manipulative creep to those
he manipulated and then turns around and lies about admitting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
78. Anything to keep the STATUS KUO, Right, KKKARL?
Just when you think Karl can't get any sleazier...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Sure, KKKarl, we believe you!

:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well. That's that, then. What's next?
We believe you, Tony Snow :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Rove's word is bond, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
65. lol, Snowjob isn't pulling it off on this forum, te he
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. of course he denies it. he said he had nothing to do with plame too.
both lies of course among many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Yep. It's not a crime to lie to the media or the public, apparently.
Just don't lie to the grand jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, that confirms the story
They lie about everything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well that's the end of the story
the white house said it and every religiously insane zealot in the country will be repeating it coast to coast so it must be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course he's going to say that
The nuts are their base. You don't insult your base even if they are bat-shit insane which of course they are. Rove is arrogant enough and enough of an asshole to think that it wouldn't get out but now he's going to deny it. It's a pretty big paycheck to be casually insulting like that.

The odd thing is, I think it's the first thing that pig has ever said that I agree with completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. That settles it, then
Would KKKarl lie? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. sorta off the topic
its not rove but wasn't there one of the Abramhoff letters where he called the Evangelicals nuts? a pattern ...of sorts perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Indeed, the "Scanlon Memo" (released early Nov. last year):

"The wackos get their information through the Christian right, Christian radio, mail, the internet and telephone trees," Scanlon wrote in the memo, which was read into the public record at a hearing of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. "Simply put, we want to bring out the wackos to vote against something and make sure the rest of the public lets the whole thing slip past them." (Oct 2001)


http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/11/03/abramoff/index_np.html
http://indian.senate.gov/2005hrgs/110205hrg/110205exhibits.pdf
http://www.chris-floyd.com/jack/ page 119 "Mobilization"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
90. Wackos, not nuts.
:wtf:
So...Let me see if I have this straight...
You CAN call your friends 'wackos'...but god forbid you should call them 'nuts'!
All the difference in the world. :sarcasm:

With 'friends' like KKKarl...:puke:
you might as well just shoot yourself and be done with it. At least your reputation may survive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
109. They're evil, not crazy
At least the ones running the Freak Circus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sure Karl like someone
would make this stuff up?

We got them on the defensive, they have to be out there denying charges now. This is an interesting turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'll use the Patrick McHenry line of reasoning
For those not in the know, Patrick McHenry is the Republican tool from South Carolina who was spouting off on Wolf Blitzer's show about how the Democrats had sprung the Mark Foley Affair in an attempt to win back Congress. He went on with a series of wilder and wilder accusations until Blitzer himself couldn't stomach it anymore, and asked if McHenry had any proof that the Democrats had known about Foley, sat on the story for months, then launched it at the most inopportune time for Republicans. McHenry stuttered, stammered, and finally spluttered that while he didn't have any fancy evidence or proof of his assertions, could Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democratic leadership prove they hadn't done what he'd just accused them of doing?

So, since Mr. McHenry has so helpfully blazed the trail, let's just follow along. Can Karl Rove prove he didn't call evangelicals and fundamentalists "nuts"? Otherwise, it's perfectly acceptable to say that he did, and tough toenails, Tony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrub chipper Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Of course, just like Miss McHenry,
we just sit back and wait for proof that they didn't say those things, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wageslave71 Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. McHenry represents
the 10th Congressional District of North Carolina.

I just got e-mailed this link this afternoon:

http://www.gayhickory.com/category/democratic-party/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
46. Can Ku Klux Karl
prove he's not the bottom to Jeff Gannon who had several overnight stays in the White House. Who was Gannon topping: Rove, Dick, Bush? Inquiring minds want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
85. Something I bet you didn't know about McHenry...
He conducts black masses in his basement, where he sacrifices small children after molesting them.

Let him deny it if he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
89. I guess that the GOP tearing up of the constitution
means that the fundamental principal of the burden of proof being on the accuser no longer applies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. I smell the sulphur too, Karl. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. People should stop pulling Bush's finger.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's right. He called them "idiots". Get the name correct. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PegDAC Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
107. Exactly.
It's a technicality. Not an exact quote. So sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Are we to believe that Snow would be honest about Rove's so called answer
Let's pretend like Tony Snow and Co. did ask Rove about the allegations. Are we to believe that 1) Rove would answer truthfully, and 2) Snow would report truthfully if the answer was, "Yes, I did call them nuts!"??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. David Kuo vs Jabba the Hut HMMMMM?
Edited on Fri Oct-13-06 03:16 PM by Rambis
jabba has credibility oozing out of his soul....
Ok, he is telling the truth thanks Tony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. So Karl Rove wouldn't HEAR of disparaging the Christian Right...
Edited on Fri Oct-13-06 03:34 PM by seafan
Karl and his close associates would NEVER disparage the Christian Right...WHY, they owe their political positions and fat bank accounts to these people.





Michael Scanlon and Jack Abramoff


November 3, 2005

Up-and-coming Republican hacks would do well to watch closely the ongoing Senate investigations of superstar lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his former business partner Michael Scanlon. The power duo stand accused of exploiting Native American tribes to the tune of roughly $66 million, laundering that money into bank accounts they controlled and then using it to buy favors for powerful members of Congress and the executive branch.

But they sure did know how to play the game.

Consider one memo highlighted in a Capitol Hill hearing Wednesday that Scanlon, a former aide to Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, sent the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana to describe his strategy for protecting the tribe's gambling business. In plain terms, Scanlon confessed the source code of recent Republican electoral victories: target religious conservatives, distract everyone else, and then railroad through complex initiatives.

"The wackos get their information through the Christian right, Christian radio, mail, the internet and telephone trees," Scanlon wrote in the memo, which was read into the public record at a hearing of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. "Simply put, we want to bring out the wackos to vote against something and make sure the rest of the public lets the whole thing slip past them." The brilliance of this strategy was twofold: Not only would most voters not know about an initiative to protect Coushatta gambling revenues, but religious "wackos" could be tricked into supporting gambling at the Coushatta casino even as they thought they were opposing it.


snip



Hypocrisy has a sulfurous stench.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Why do those pics of Scanlon and Abramoff on your post
set off my (admittedly imperfect) gaydar???????

Is it me? Or do those two have a secret?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Scanlon was a lifeguard and Abramoff was a wrestler in younger days....
And I don't know the answer to your question, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
67. hmm, same thought crossed my mind. Then there's the other WH duo, Rove &
Gannnon.

Not that there's anything wrong with being gay except the hypocrisy of being gay while reThuglican. It is now all very understandable, the contempt these gay men must feel for the wacko gay bashers and anti-abortionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #67
87. Rightwing irony
Wouldn't it be perfect justice, if the Christian "family value" Fundamentalists find out they've been supporting and hugely funding s WH that is the biggest 'closet' ever to inhabit the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. He didn't call them "nuts"
So he used some other term, like "looney".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civildisoBDence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. And Abramoff called his Native American clients "monkeys"
To be a fly on the wall when these cynical assholes get together...

Newsprism--News and commentary, left to right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. All it would take to topple the entire government
would be an invisible man with a camera and about an hour of battery life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
64. And Sen Macacawitz never used the N word either
Fucking lying CONS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. bwahahahaha, that's a great name for the senator, er ex-senator, lol
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. The added quote about "friends" should seal it for anybody who was
doubtful about the truthfulness of the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. if Kuo had been lying about any of it, the response from the WH would have
been ferocious, claiming a partisan attack, claiming that Kuo had been paid to lie. this calm response sounds completely false, and will not resonate with the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. Richard Wright, "Black Boy". . .
"Now, boy, I want to ask you one question and I want you to tell me the truth," she said.

"Yes ma'am," I said, afraid to trust my own judgment.

"Do you steal?" she asked me seriously.

I burst into a laugh, then checked myself.

"What's so damn funny about that?" she asked me seriously.

"Lady, if I was a thief, I'd never tell anybody."

<snip>

Habit had overcome her rationality and had made her ask me: "Boy, do you steal?" Only an idiot would have answered: "Yes, ma'am. I steal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. morons, yes; pond scum, yes; crazies, yes: Nuts, NO.
yeah, that is accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. Don't forget "batshit crazy"
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
96. but is that a yes or a no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well,,, he probably just forgot that he hates fundies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. He probably didn't call them "nuts".
He called them "fucking nuts". That is totally different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. It's TRUE! He never called them "nuts"... he called them...
...."loonies and yokels."

So there.

vindicatorially,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momzno1 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. at least they are consistent
they lie about ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING that they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. And we are supposed to believe them?
They haven't told me the truth about anything to date. Why would I think they are going to start now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #33
86. It started with the
Clinton staff vandalizing the White House. The whole Republican Party has a nervous tic from lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JRob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. ...and we expected him to say? OK then, we believe you. Give me a break!
Like this is going to stop speculation one way or the other. Credibility? Not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. Well then, it's settled!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
37. Hahahahahahaha!!!
:rofl: That's totally hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. okey doky rovey---we believe you.
NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
40. YO ROVE---you should not betray your friends like this. no no no
"these are my friends, I don't talk about them like that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
58. 'Good friend' Kuo is about to get a Rove lynch job. Wonder how that'll
play out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. This is the perfect job for Tony Snow
he's such a damn good liar. You gotta give the guy credit. He's a pathological liar and lies as good as anyone I've ever seen. Ron Ziegler would have loved to have been as good a liar as Snow. Nixxon would have loved to have had Snow as his spokesman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
70. yes, Snowjob is very good in his covering-for-the-pResident role
what a frigging bunch of flaming criminal a-holes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. Sickos loonies Wackos and Uninformed have been sooo
USED and the Religious Right wake up and see your
Hero Bush just USED you idiots

I told this to my Christian Right friend and told her Roe vs Wade after 6 years of Republican rule is still in effect...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
44. I agree with Karl Rove!
:scared:

The religiously insane ARE frickin' nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delete_bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
45. Odd, it appears the story has changed...
It quotes Karl Rove or staffers close to him calling evangelical leaders "nuts," among many other hot charges.

Regardless, a fish smells from the head.

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
47. Oooooh, I thought it was WRONG to deny, isn't it a sign of WEAKNESS
to be on defense? Shouldn't they just be sneering and ignoring? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
48. Anybody catch Snow's Freudian slip?
****
This is one of these things where he believes years and years down the road, when people are reviewing this White House, this is going to be one of the signal accomplishments. Using -- harnessing the power of faith to deal with people one on one, face to face, in dealing with some of the most intractable problems that our society faces.
****

You had it right the first time, Tony. USING. Yes, the repub's have been USING the faith based community for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #48
93. great catch. LOL!
hahahah!!! Made even more evident by the correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
49. Oh my.......looks like Rove might be 'left behind'.
Besides, it takes one to know one. Nuts and nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
51. "we've asked Karl, did leak Valerie Plame's name? He said, no."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
52. He also swore up and down he had nothing to do with leaking Valerie
Plame's name either. Such a paragon of honesty, the Pillsbury Roveboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
53. Oh well, if the White House says that Rove denies calling
...evangelicals "nuts" then I guess that is believable...:wtf:

Let's put KKKarl Rove and others in the White House under oath and ask that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #53
69. good idea, I would love to see the bunch of them hauled up before a GJ
These guys needs to have their pockets wrung out of their money and spend the rest of their lives on a Georgia road crew in chains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PegDAC Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #69
108. How about
Joe Arpaio's tent city in Phoenix in June?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
55. Of course he denies it.
That doesn't in any way prove that he didn't say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
57. sure, i also deny calling my sister in law a raving lunatic and battle axe
but when she's not around thats exactly how i refer to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
59. LIARS! They couldn't tell the truth if GOD threatened them...
I don't ever believe ANYTHING those WAR CRIMINALS ever say!

I bet my life & fortune on that stance, and it's money in the bank...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
60. Bwaahahaha. I, for one, don't buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
62. This reminds me of Valerie Plame
snotty scotty QUACK QUACK said the same thing
about Rove durring in response to a Plame question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
63. I guess Woodward was wrong in his attribution of nuts to blackwell as well
looks like a pattern of nuts calling to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
66. You mean Karl Rove called the Extra Chromosome Conservatives "Nuts"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
71. He's right, you know.. he called them F'ing Nuts..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
72. Q: How do you tell if a rethuglican is lying?





A: See if his/her lips are moving.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #72
105. Or his/her fingers are typing on a computer keyboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarinCoUSA Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
75. Who the Fu*k CARES what these liars say. Anytime! Anywhere?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
76. Wow, Rove's word. That's gotta be all we need.
Would you buy a used car from Karl Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
77. That evangelicals who support this cabal are nuts is inescapable
and would be inexplicable but for the fact that's what those brainwashed and lacking any critical-thinking skills do which explains almost all of the 'puke base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
79. White House denies book's allegations

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061014/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_aide_s_book;_ylt=AnKsR_67mz4DdTICLkZOWpc7Xs8F;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--

White House denies book's allegations

By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer Fri Oct 13, 9:40 PM ET

WASHINGTON - A former Bush aide claims that evangelical Christians were embraced for political gain at the White House but derided privately as "nuts," "ridiculous" and "goofy."



The allegations — denied by the White House on Friday — are in a new book by David Kuo, a conservative Christian who was deputy director of
President Bush's Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives until 2003.

The book describes Kuo's frustration at what he felt was lackluster enthusiasm in the White House for the program, which seeks to steer more federal social service contracts to religious organizations. Details from the book, "Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction," were reported by MSNBC ahead of Monday's publication date.

Kuo singled out staffers in the office of Karl Rove, Bush's top political adviser and deputy chief of staff, as particularly condescending toward evangelical Christians, viewing them as necessary to help win elections but ridiculing them behind the scenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. Snow read from what he called a "very warm letter" Kuo wrote to Bush ----




.....Bush's spokesman also said there was no attempt to exploit the office to score political points, and that the president had specifically directed it not be politicized.

Snow denied Kuo's charge that the White House's religious charities program wasn't given the status it deserved, saying Bush's personal commitment to the policy was solid. Kuo has complained publicly in the past that the White House did not push hard enough for promised federal funding for religious groups to help the poor.

Snow read from what he called a "very warm letter" Kuo wrote to Bush when he left the White House. Kuo told the president he was proud of what the initiative had accomplished and said "it's your staff's keen awareness of your unwavering support for this initiative that's made the difference."

Snow concluded that the reports on the book "seem at odds with what he was saying inside the building at the time he departed."

Kuo's account of how the faith-based office has been regarded inside the White House recalls that of another high-level alumnus of the program. John J. DiIulio Jr., the faith-based office's first director, who quit in 2002, told Esquire magazine that "Mayberry Machiavellis" led by Rove based policy only on re-election concerns. After his comments caused an uproar, DiIulio apologized for making what he said were rude remarks........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
81. No, he really said "cashews"
just like he never revealed Valerie Plame's name, he just said the wife of Joseph Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrfocus Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
82. Isn't it funny that an agnostic like Karl Rove...
...steered the GOP firmly into the hand of religious moonbats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
83. nice
Denials keep things like this in the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
84. Ah yes, we should just take them at their word, they never lie!
LOL

Someone shit in Carl's Cheerios with this new book. :D

I love it.

The implosion will be televised. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matthewf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
88. right
suuuuure he denies it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
91. Rove just blew his one shot at telling the truth
He had it right the first time. Now he's not just a panderer but a liar as well. Of course, that's nothing new
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. That's how he's going to get away with it.
Unfortunately, conservative Christians now heavily invested in Karl Rove, and they'll believe whatever he says so long as he doesn't say what he obviously thinks, which is that the bible thumpers are a bunch of crazy-ass idiots.

They'll believe him because it's easier to believe whatever he says than it is to re-consider their lives as dupes toiling in the service of evil. And their preachers will be backing that up all the way, because if that ball of string ever starts to unravel Pastor Whitemon loses his ten-percent Jesus tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladydawnelle Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
94. By NOW
NO one (or Barely anyone) believes an Fing Word that comes out of the White House.

Most are just turning the channel or turning OFF the TV all together. (or so I hear from the NON political people I still hang with, also my relatives, my kid and her friends too)

They think I am just torturing myself by keeping up with it all! But if I don't ....... who the hell else will? Or that's what I tell them. And they do come to me when they have questions about certain candidates, etc. Thankfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShotInTheDark Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
95. White House Says Rove Denies Calling Evangelicals "Nuts"
Faux News: In Response, Evangelicals Deny Calling Republicans "Fruits" -- Vow To Support the Alternative Lifestyles of the GOP

(from the Associated Vegetables in the Press)

... ...

Meanwhile, former White House advisor Scooter Libby continues to sell copies of his 1996 pornographic book, The Apprentice, featuring pedophilia, beastiality, rape, and incest.

No reponse from the Republican stalwart when asked if he would pull copies from the bookshelves because of its ilicit content, including sex between a bear and a (caged) pre-pubescent girl.

With new light being shed on the Foley sex scandal, politicians and citizens alike are questioning how Libby is connected to all this, and whether 'The Apprentice' titling is of a gratuitous nature, based upon past experiences with congressional pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
97. what did you expect?
When snow-job is confronted with these kinds of questions, there is really only one response he can give. They aren't going to say, "yeah, but he was just pissed off that day..." or "sure, but he really didn't mean it like nuts being crazy, he meant it as an endearing term.." It probably is fun to watch snow-job wiggle and act cute though, but just ask yourself..."can you get an image of Rove doing something like that?" I think you know the answer. Screw snow-job's snow job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. Hi Hulk , Welcome. Kkkarl is Embodiment of Joe Goebbels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UncleSepp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. Rove couldn't fill Goebbels's shoes
For one, they wouldn't fit ;-)

Seriously. Rove's not that good, or we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #101
111. Oh no doubt, Joe was the wizard of Evil.But Kkkarl uses the same apparatus
media wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UncleSepp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. Sort of... Rove does not have the apparatus under his control
There are the planted stories and the deals for access, but the news and entertainment media are not under his control nor subject to his review. Friendly media outlets produce helpful material, but he isn't directing any of it. He doesn't have the capacity to keep a play or an opera off the stage. He's not organizing any mass events. The propaganda coming from this administration is still in a pre-revolutionary mode in the domestic sphere, and really only gets to the post-revolutionary phase in foreign propaganda where the restrictions that exist for domestic effords do not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #114
116. Ambiguous capability is where Kkkarl has it over Joe ,and getting away...
..with treason ,and though he only holds 5 official jobs ,his influence is dangerous and ultimately Anti-American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
98. Rove: "I didn't say NUTS"...."I said ASSHOLES...they are ASSHOLES"
"Not NUTs....ASSHOLES....Ya got that???"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkb Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
100. Republican Leadership Is Money Driven, Not Values Oriented
     Money, Sex, and Power is what the lessons should be for
well-meaning people in the world to learn.
     These are the most visible driving forces that humans
engage in, and the people who traditionally wield power are
products of that struggle.  They cooperate with more
reasonable people only because they must, at least to some
degree, in order to get what they want.  So the relationship
to evangelicals should be seen as making friends only to get
power and have those desired things in life.
     I hope people will see this Republican strategy as
clearly as possible, and think about hypocrisy and why it
happens.
     As always, there are consequences to even thinking for
yourself, as well as stating opinions and voting.  So think
things through before you act, but I hope realizing it's hard
to not do anything in this world and have things work out. 
Good Luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
102. They Used "Faith" Programs to Buy Support for Bush by Ministers
Edited on Sun Oct-15-06 05:08 PM by JPZenger
The faith based programs were a sham. They were used to buy the political support of minority ministers, such as an African-American minister in an impoverished part of North Philadelphia. The Repubs poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into his church before the 2004 election, which allowed for a photo op of Bush speaking inside a Church of Black people.

In Bethlehem PA, we have a new large Federally funded building named "The Christian Education Center." One of the ministers behind that center became infamous for his court challenge of an Allentown PA ordinance that prohibited the firing of employees simply because they were gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
103. To the defeat the evil over there, we have to defeat the evil here, specif
ically the evil that resides in the White House and the Halls of Congress known as this fraudulent Republican conservatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
104. Snowjob said that? Lying bastard n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
106. White House admits hiring blatant liar, David Kuo, to work on faith-based
initiatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
othermeans Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
110. The interview of Kuo on 60 minutes was very interesting. He is
currently being treated for an inoperable brain tumor and far from being a wild eyed fundamentalist he appeared in the interview to be very straightforward and as he said, naive about the way that he was taken in by the Bush administration. He then took Leslie Stahl on a tour of a Fundamentalist convention where he pointed out that the fundamentalist community was not interested in the poor but rather a political agenda as evidenced by their books and tapes for sale.

All in all a person of conscience who left the White House in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #110
113. I saw the interview last night.
Edited on Mon Oct-16-06 09:24 AM by AllexxisF1
Although it can be easy to believe this dying man, the guy just seemed like some sort of loon. I don't know if he is on some medication or what, but when he makes the circuit today and through the rest of the week people like O'liely are going to tear him to pieces.

I believe he is on CNN's Situation Room along with Faux tonight.

Going to be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
115. They Deny Speaking the Truth?
Don't they know, "the truth shall set you free"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC