Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pregnancy drug (DES) doubles risk of breast cancer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 03:28 PM
Original message
Pregnancy drug (DES) doubles risk of breast cancer
http://www.newstarget.com/019907.html

NewsTarget) Boston University scientists announced today that the anti-miscarriage drug
diethylstilboestrol (DES) -- commonly prescribed from 1940 to 1975 -- could double the normal risk of breast cancer in exposed women.
In the study, disease rates were tested in around 5,000 women who were exposed to DES in the womb, and then compared to disease rates of about 2,000 women who were not. Seventy-six cases of breast cancer were identified in the DES group, while 26 were identified in the control group.

"This is really unwelcome news because so many women worldwide were prenatally exposed to DES, and they are just now approaching the age at which breast cancer becomes more common," said lead researcher Julie Palmer.

The study found that the cancer risk did not seem to change for women under the age of 40, but women over 40 were twice as likely to develop the condition. Cancer risk for participants over the age of 50 was found to be even higher.

"This study suggests that daughters of mothers who took the drug DES during their pregnancies may have a higher risk of breast cancer as they get older," said Ed Yong, a senior cancer information officer at Cancer Research UK. "But this does not mean that they will definitely develop the disease."

:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another link....
I wonder how many women were exposed and don't even know it. Well, women and men because men need to be checked for cancers as well. My mother took this for three pregnancies.

<snip>

It was already known that so-called "DES-daughters" were at a greater risk of a rare form of vaginal cancer and suffered from fertility problems, including an increased chance of miscarriage. Men can also be affected.

About 200,000 women in the UK are thought to have taken DES, but it is unclear how many of their children are affected - many may have no idea their mothers took the drug.

The Boston team, in a report in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, said those affected should avoid hormone replacement therapy, due to the greater cancer risk.

Jane Kevan, of the campaign group DES Action, said the study confirmed the results of a smaller survey in 2002 that first suggested a link with breast cancer. She said: "The reaction from most of us in the group is, it's another thing to worry about. Where is it all going to end?"

http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=1146952006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Drugs used in fertility treatments have never been tested for dosages Rxed
Once the FDA has approved a drug, it may be prescribed for any purpose in any amount a physician chooses. A pharmacist friend told me he was stunned the first time a woman brought in Rx's from her fertility clinic - the drugs had never been tested for the large dosages prescribed - on anyone, let alone on pregnant women with followups to determine the effects upon children, particularly as they reached puberty. One of my kids' best friends got these drugs, was seriously ill from the week she started them, throughout the pregnancy, and within a year of delivering her twins, had developed 4 different cancers and died before the babies' first birthdays. There is no federal oversight of these clinics, and the civilized medical world (Europe)refers to US fertility programs as the Wild West of medicine. It is sad that anyone feels so strongly the need to reproduce that they would put their own lives at stake, as well as risking their children's health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. My mom had several miscarriages before she had me...
I was seriously worried that she had taken this, but luckily, ? she had a country doctor who never prescribed it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. this was once used as the "morning after pill"
1: JAMA. 1973 Jun 18;224(12):1581-2.

FDA considers DES safe as 'morning-after' pill.



PIP: Food and Drug Administration approval of labeling for diethylstilbestrol (DES) as a postcoital contraceptive is reported. DES is considered safe only as an emergency contraceptive measure. The recommended dose is 2.5 mg twice a day for 5 days. Treatment should be initiated 24-72 hours after coitus. It is important that the full regimen be completed, even if nausea, which is common with oral DES, is present. There is yet no evidence that DES poses a significant carcinogenic risk to the mother or the fetus. However, if treatment fails, abortion should be seriously considered because of possible teratogenic effects or carcinoma in female offspring.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12257949&dopt=Abstract

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm no brainiac but I can't see the doubled rates.
76/5000 = .0152
26/2000 = .013
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC