Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Affirms Wetlands Protections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:54 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Affirms Wetlands Protections
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the government can block development on hundreds of millions of acres of wetlands, even on land miles away from waterways, as long as regulators prove a connection to the waterways.

Chief Justice John Roberts, in his first major environmental case, came up one vote short of dramatically limiting the scope of the landmark Clean Water Act.


The key decision was by Kennedy, who agreed with the liberal members that federal regulations can apply to land adjacent to tributaries, including tributaries that are not filled with water all year.

Kennedy, however, joined conservatives in ruling that regulators may have misinterpreted the Clean Water Act when they refused to let two Michigan property owners build a shopping mall and condominiums on wetlands they own.



More at http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-5897891,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Biernuts Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. You should use quotation marks when you lift material verbatim
Otherwise, the writing may be attributed to you.

This ruling is no slam dunk, has several parts and complex voting pluralities.
Even though the court allowed the federal government to block development in the specific case at hand, it came with a big qualifier: 'if it proves development would "significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity" of nearby navigable waters.' <http://apnews.excite.com/article/20060619/D8IBIB000.html>

Although not permitting development without limit, this could be a very significant ruling because the court's plurality also restricted the (Army's) Corps of Engineers jurisdiction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The box format indicates I did not author the post
Also the actual link to the news article indicates the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't think LBN really requires quotes around the article snippet.
It's a given that postings in LBN come from the article cited in the link, since you're only allowed to post articles :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. From DU's HTML lookup table:
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 08:12 PM by Doremus
"Create a styled, indented blockquote (useful for posting excerpts from articles) - {div class ="excerpt"] Text

Quotes would be redundant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC