Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida votes to require high school majors (AP/CNN)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 02:41 PM
Original message
Florida votes to require high school majors (AP/CNN)
Friday, May 5, 2006; Posted: 9:36 a.m. EDT (13:36 GMT)

TALLAHASSEE, Florida (AP) -- The Florida Legislature gave final approval to a bill Thursday that requires high school students to declare a major, similar to college students.

The measure now goes to Governor Jeb Bush, who pushed the requirement as part of a sweeping education overhaul approved by the House 90-24. The Senate passed it earlier in the day 39-1.
***
The bill also requires that high school students take a fourth year of math and that middle school students receive career planning instruction.
***
"We're saying we're trying to get students to think more in terms of, 'What do I really like to do? What is my talent?"' said Senate Education Committee Chairwoman Evelyn Lynn, a Republican.

A major area of interest could include a traditional academic subject such as English, a foreign language or math, or a vocational field such as carpentry or auto repair.
***
more: http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/05/05/high.school.majors.ap/index.html

What'll it be ... Morlock or Eloi ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. crazy
even college freshman are urged not to declare a major. Isn't it about trying EVERYTHING to see what you like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. I wonder if Crack Dealer will be one of the choices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yet another giant step toward destroying public education in FL
This could be a good idea if done correctly, but the chances of that under Jeb and the GOP is less than zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is a modified Euopean model -choose tech or college level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I teach high school students & no way do many of them know what they
want to do in life. I do think those who are not academically oriented or motivated should begin to learn a trade so at least they will be able to survive in society. However, they still need to work on basic reading, writing and math because they can't read the auto repair manuals, do carpentry or write out a work order without those skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Do you think that if the expectations were raised and...
high school students were encouraged more to explore an area of interest, that they would be more inclined to choose a major?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. College students change their major, on average, three times
during their college careers, and they are in a place where they can explore different fields.

High school students should not be put in this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Wouldn't it be better for them to gain more direction in high school...
before they start spending thousands of dollars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. But through electives, you might get a better idea
For example, I took accounting in high school as a sophomore. That course made me decide that I didn't want to be an accountant. If I would have had to major in something, I probably wouldn't have taken that class. Having to major in something, especially since many colleges want 4 years in the major subjects, limits the number of electives one can take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-07-06 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. There isn't enough breadth in the high school courses
to allow the students to decide their direction. That's my point.

And I think that this will only become *more* of the case as the secondary school budgets continue to get squeezed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. The average high school kid already knows
where his/her talents lie. Some are athletes. Some are into music. Some are artistic. Some are glued to a laptop. Some kick ass on a skateboard. Some write. Some just like to hang out with their friends. It's all good. Forcing a kid to declare an academic "major" in high school is a ridiculous idea that could only have come from the warped mind of a repuke. When did it cease to be ok for a kid to just enjoy being a kid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. the problem I see
The problem I see is that if a kid declares a major, he or she is likely to start thinking all the other parts of the curriculum are unimportant. I hate how math-minded students go around thinking they don't need writing skills and how literary-minded students think they don't need to understand algebra.

And these ideas are perpetuated in most colleges, where the average physics professor can't write his way out of a paper bag and the average classics professor doesn't know what a vector is.

We need less specialization in academia, not more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Very well put, Bill
I quite agree. Specialization to the degree these people want is for insects, not humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I didn't declare a major until I was a senior
in college! This is another example of Republicans destroying the educational system, and all of progressive society, bit by bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am not raising my child in this state.
This place sucks so freaking bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larissa238 Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's why we need to move to Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yup, let's shunt the less-advantaged kids off to trade school early
We've been here before. We've done this before. It's a way for the privileged to make sure "outsiders" stay outside where they belong.

Ugh. I really hate this. I'm 46 years old, and I still don't know what the hell I want to be if I grow up! How can we really take a 16-year-old and tell them, "now decide what you want to do for the rest of your life"? They don't even know how to pee straight yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The average high school starting age is fourteen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. So where does that leave my kid who is registered as an Arts student?
Let's please get the politicians OUT of our education system!!!!! They are killing it!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grilled onions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. It Didn't Work In The Sixties
Kids who had talent in music or the arts,but failed miserably at science or history never stood a chance to get into the drama dept or the music dept. Girls who had no direction were pushed into that lovely "career" home ec where they were schooled on boiling water,hemming a skirt and how many spoons to use at a fancy dinner party. If you were not college material you were pretty much left on the line to dry and left with little help in which direction they wanted to go. Sadly 'Nam took many of them who tired of never getting to learn what they truly wanted to learn. Today as careers have to change as jobs go voerseas and technology alters skills needed it seems insane to have kids learn and re-learn several times before they even get out of college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. "Today as careers have to change..." Yeah, that part bugs me too.
According to the gospel of the free marketeers, who swear that this is really the best thing that could happen to us, if we only understood it -- Gone are assured jobs for a lifetime! Gone is the single-skill career! Expect to change careers every few years -- the unfettered free market demands it! This according to Tom Friedman and other shills for "globalization", which REALLY means (even when they refuse to say it) "globalization of capital ONLY".

With the corporatists shoving all this down our throats, people end up having to change careers to survive -- but what's best for the bottom line of the corporations is an abundance of worker bees trained to do today's jobs, and too ignorant to know that they're expendable. Hence the drive to force kids into a specialization before they know what's going on. By the time they figure it out, too late ... they're "redudunancies", to use the British term. And too late to get that broader education that would have helped them adapt to the changed job market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Our Iowa schools were not like that - the problem in the 50 and
early 60s was not motivation and being shunted aside. It was lack of funds to go to college. Many of the students in my class and my siblings classes went the way you are describing because they had not hope of paying for college so they did not even aim for that goal. I know because until college loans became available in the late 60s I could not go even though I had very high academic grade levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. they already have magnet schools
for science and arts. I don't know how well the concepts works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. I can see a positive side to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. This has advantages and disadvantages
Edited on Fri May-05-06 06:31 PM by bluestateguy
On the one hand, students who are not so motivated about school might become more motivated if they could develop an academic field of concentration and take more specialized courses where they have interests and talents.

On the other hand, students at that age cannot reasonably be expected to know what they want to do in life. They should not be pushed to make these decisions right away, especially if it comes at the expense of a well-rounded education in the arts and sciences. I also fear that students who don't do well in school will be labeled as "blue-collar", and be forced to choose a major like auto shop or mechanics, at the expense of learning about math, science and the humanities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. A good auto mechanic in thie day and age is not a bad thing to be
His job is unlikely to be outsourced, and our mechanic drives a brand new caddy:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. My BIL has been a 'specialized' Mercedes mechanic for 25? years
or so, and makes a very good living. As much as or maybe more than I as a pilot. (But then I don't get a lot of grease under my nails) :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. lol most Mercedes mechanics don't either (get grease
under their nails). I've been in the "industry" for over 30 years. The most successful techs I knew had a saying 10 by 10 and you're having a good day. I asked what that meant, the answer. 10 hours of billed labor by 10 am was the start of a good day. They started at 8 AM so under their pay plan they could earn 10 hours of labor (at $25.00 an hour their pay) in 2 hours, that's $250.00 in the first two hours of work! They both made huge amounts of money and were very happy being "grease monkeys", thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. My high school had a "three track" system waaay back in the 60's
We had :

Vo-tech track
Regular track
College prep

I cannot believe that schools do not STILL have this system..

NOT ALL KIDS CAN OR WILL GO TO COLLEGE..

High school SHOULD be something more than a place to parade around in your spiffy duds, hook up with pals, and

be a place to hang out for 6 hours a day.. It SHOULD be about "life-preparation"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. This plan would have been a disaster for me
I would have picked drama. That's what I was "into" in High School. Well, I finally realized after a year in college that I can't act my way out of a bag.

So, in my early years of college I decided I was going to be a writer. But, I eventually realized that I am not talented in writing, either.

Discovering one's vocation is sometimes easy and sometimes hard. I was one of the hard ones.

So, under this wonderful Republican plan, I would have trained in high school for a career in theatre. Then, I would have been turned down by every theatre program in the country. What would have happened then? Depression, feelings of worthlessness. Probably wouldn't have gone to college at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. This idea sounds very similar to the European school
system (if still the same?) of routing students from the sixth year level to either college or non-college preparatory levels. Those who want and are capable of higher education take one track and those who do not want or cannot are routed to a vocational/apprentice track. I have always thought that would be fine as long as a student could gain higher education at any time in his/her life if they wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. Stupid Idea
This is a stupid idea. It does nothing to make kids think more or learn more. It just puts pressure on kids to specialize in something before the need to. I think the general education form of high school is much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Exactly.
A lot of kids don't know what they want to major in until they've been in college for a couple of years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. I was a very talented musician.
Edited on Sat May-06-06 01:43 AM by kgfnally
I SUCKED in math. Horribly. I just didn't have the mind for it back then. Now, as an adult, I'm becoming very curious about algebra, trig, and calc, just because I think I could hack it now.

I very simply can't imagine myself even trying to learn any of those, to any degree of competence, when I was in high school. Now that I'm away from music- which is where my true talents were- I'm thinking it might be a good idea to learn those subjects, just for the sake of learning and keeping my brain sharp.

That said, a dedicated high school music major would have been a godsend for me. I wouldn't have been expected to try to learn things I'd already demonstrated in earlier years I had no talent for whatever; I would have been able to devote another x time per day to music, and I would definitely have been better off for it.

I yearned for a music theory course in high school. I wanted a marching band that worked shows year-round. I wanted two musicals a year. And an orchestra. And teachers dedicated to our school available to the entire group(s)- you know, like the sports teams had.

But then, by the end of my freshman year/beginning of my sophomore year in high school, I knew I wanted to teach high school music. That didn't happen, and it was in some part due to the fact the the extended early programs- theory, orchestra, composition- were not available, period.

These things associated with a high school 'major' are not often available. But, who am I kidding? Music programs will never get an appreciable amount of money to work with, and it's a damn shame.

edit: errant italic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. I guess I don't get the nuts & bolts of this...don't HS students still
have plenty of electives? Does this legislation change or limit those choices?...the piece doesn't really say, so I wonder how it quantitavely or qualitatively actually changes things...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. I went to a magnet school for the Arts
it is kinda hard to explain how the school was set up. The school itself had 2 other programs housed in the school besides the art school. But the art students were more motivated as compared to students that just attended the school and not the other two programs. We've had a lot of successful students come out of the SOTA program.
But the reason I bring it up is that there was specialization. Of course, it later became a requirement that we had to take cross-discipline courses along side all the academic work that we had to do. Sure some of the kids went into their field of study, others however did not.
I think that this is a great idea, it has worked very well for the students who have gone through these programs. I think it gives them focus and garners their interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. I don't think it should be required, but could depend on specifics
At my school, we were required to have a "major" but it only meant taking 4 years of a subject, other than in English in which 4 years was already required. My school which was relatively small belonged to a set of schools which allowed juniors and seniors to take a half day of classes at a vocational high school in which they majored in something like building trades, medical careers, or culinary careers. This was completely optional but it did prepare students for those specific careers which some then went into. Others who completed the program went to college or trade school for further study in that field or something completely different.
I don't know the specifics of the major. Many 4 year colleges want students to take 4 years of all the core curriculm subjects (science, math, English, social science/history, foreign language). If the major requires many courses, it could be difficult for some students to complete major requirements and college entrance requirements. Changing majors could mess this up more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. When discussing any of Jeb's education "reforms" keep in mind he
doesn't believe in free public education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. Just watch. They will tie this choice to in state ed costs & loans
Private school students will be exempted from having to make this choice.

These evil bastards just won't stop destroying ed in Florida.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
39. New York State Regents Diploma
Been there, done that 40 years ago. Yes, we had to declare a major, whether a Science, or a Foreign Language, or Business and Careers (anything from a Secretary to an LPN to a Mechanic), in addition to the 4 years of English, 4 years of Social Studies, 3 years of Math, etc., etc.

Sounds like Florida is just copying us. The bottom line is that with the academic FOUNDATION, you can always change your mind. My daughter went from being a Art Major in HS to being an Elementary Education Major in College. She could not have done this without the core academic subjects in HS.

I would not get so hung up on the word "major" without looking at the rest of the required academic curriculum. This article is very short on the specifics of the Florida program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC