Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TRUTHOUT: Jason Leopold - State Dept Memo: '16 Words' Were False

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 10:31 PM
Original message
TRUTHOUT: Jason Leopold - State Dept Memo: '16 Words' Were False
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 10:37 PM by Hissyspit
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041706Y.shtml

State Department Memo: '16 Words' Were False
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Click here to view a digitized copy of the memo.

Monday 17 April 2006

Eleven days before President Bush's January 28, 2003, State of the Union address in which he said that the US learned from British intelligence that Iraq had attempted to acquire uranium from Africa - an explosive claim that helped pave the way to war - the State Department told the CIA that the intelligence the uranium claims were based upon were forgeries, according to a newly declassified State Department memo.

The revelation of the warning from the closely guarded State Department memo is the first piece of hard evidence and the strongest to date that the Bush administration manipulated and ignored intelligence information in their zeal to win public support for invading Iraq.

On January 12, 2003, the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) "expressed concerns to the CIA that the documents pertaining to the Iraq-Niger deal were forgeries," the memo dated July 7, 2003, says.

Moreover, the memo says that the State Department's doubts about the veracity of the uranium claims may have been expressed to the intelligence community even earlier.

MORE AT LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Beyond a shadow of a doubt we were coerced into this war by
these evil men; can we talk about impeachment now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Apparently all we can do is talk about it. Strange world we're living in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. was this before Colin Powell showed us those fake chemical depots
I couldn't believe that Colin Powell had the audacity to stand up before millions of people and show them aerial photos of fake chemical factories etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. His address was February 5, 2003? I'm doublechecking.
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 10:44 PM by Hissyspit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. February 11, 2003:
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 10:52 PM by Hissyspit
http://www.harpers.org/ColinPowell.html

2003

Week of Jan 14
Bush Administration sources said they had largely completed their plans for administering Iraq after the war and securing the Iraqi oil fields; Colin Powell recently stated that the goal is to “protect those fields and make sure that they are used for the benefit of the people of Iraq.” »

Week of Jan 28
Secretary of State Colin Powell was said to be “incandescent” with rage at the new opposition, which took him by surprise and has purportedly undermined his position among President Bush's advisers. »
Colin Powell told participants that it would be useless to give the inspectors more time. »

Week of Feb 4
The president said that Secretary of State Colin Powell will soon present new evidence of Iraq's evildoing, including its alleged ties to Al Qaeda, to the United Nations Security Council. »

Week of Feb 11
Colin Powell presented the United Nations Security Council with America's latest case against Iraq. He played recordings of what he said were intercepted conversations of Iraqis discussing the removal of “forbidden ammo” from weapons sites, and he showed satellite photos in which trucks appeared to be parked next to warehouses. »
“If the Security Council were to allow a dictator to lie and deceive, the Security Council will be weakened.” The British government admitted that its new “intelligence” dossier on Iraq, which purported to provide “up-to-date details of Iraq's network of intelligence and security” and which Colin Powell cited approvingly in his presentation to the United Nations, was largely plagiarized from various published articles, including one by a student that described Iraqi intelligence activities in 1990 and 1991. »
France, Germany, and Belgium vetoed a NATO plan to reinforce Turkey's defenses in anticipation of an attack from Iraq; American officials were said to be “livid,” and Colin Powell said the action was “inexcusable.” There was talk of a “crisis of credibility.” Ansar al Islam, the militant group that supposedly has links both to Saddam Hussein and to Al Qaeda, gave reporters a tour of the camp that Colin Powell identified as a poison factory. »


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somewhere in someone's bowels- Isn't that what Rice said?
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 11:05 PM by Rose Siding
Didn't she say that's where the correct information was lodged?

How can we expect them to keep track of all the things they know that we know they know? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who declassified it, and Why? K & R. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Recommended!
And I'll say again...This illegal war will be Bush's downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It should already have been...
his downfall. Thanks to him and the compliant press, it has already been the "downfall" of 2377 US troops. He knew the yellow cake line was a lie, just like every other line that has ever come from his smirking mouth. He is stupid. He is death. It is and has long been the responsibility of Congress and the press to deliver his downfall. They are to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "Congress apnd the press" -- and the COURTS, don't forget.
If it weren't for some Supremes, * wouldn't even BE in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. True that.
And NOW they've got ScAlito!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. A great story and previously discussed here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, saw Will's post after I posted it. Good to have it here in LBN
I guess, since it's too late to delete it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's all good
Max exposure. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. we've known this since well before the invasion....
How many more memos need to be revealed? How many more former insiders need to come forward and report that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld had a hard-on for Iraq and Iran from the day they took office? WHY THE FUCK HAVE THESE EVIL SHITS NOT BEEN FROG MARCHED OFF TO THE HAGUE YET? What will it take to wake the sheep up, for christ's sake?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. mike_c, I share your frustration.
It's officially known this war was started under false pretenses; why isn't anyone punishing those responsible? Seems pretty cut and dried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Well, it doesn't involve the Clenis,
or a blow job in the Oval Office, therefore the all-knowing, almighty "librul" (snicker) media and the American sheeple have determined that it simply isn't important, gag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. In OCTOBER 2002 the CIA ordered the Niger claim taken OUT of bush's speech
The CIA TOLD BUSH the claim was false.

So how did that claim get put into bush's SOTU speech (the one where he was photo-oped poring over his speech, making changes to it)

Of course he knew.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. October 2002;
An effort was made to include in that speech the specific claim that uranium was sought from Niger, but the CIA had that claim removed from the speech.

President George W. Bush then included the 16 words in his January 2003 speech that uranium had been sought from Africaeven after the CIA had expressed reservations in October 2002.

The National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002 said, "the claims of Iraqi pursuit of natural uranium in Africa are, in INR's assessment, highly dubious".

On 11 December 2005, the Los Angeles Times reported that French intelligence had warned the Bush Administration repeatedly that there was no evidence that Saddam sought uranium from Niger.

http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/latimes975.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A56336-2003Jul14?language=printer
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=10506
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_C._Wilson

6 October 2002: CIA Director Tenet intercedes with Deputy NSC Chief Hadley to remove reference regarding Iraq trying to acquire uranium from planned speech ...

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. No blowjob, no foul.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. really.
when do we find out about the sex life of somebody in the WH? I mean all this going on and on about dead Iraqis and American troops, for no reason, gets quite tiresome. When do we get to the nitty-gritty of a little hanky-panky, that's when we will truly know that there's a there there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bush exposed. again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
19. 16 words, "16 days to a bomb."
Is there some mystical or occult significance to the number 16 I'm not aware of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. will gossip of lacross and holloway drown out this FACTOID
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 12:31 PM by Supersedeas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. It all was a freakin Lie and they have the MEMO to prove it
Bush lied and Republicans helped...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC