Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Concedes to Force-Feeding Detainees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:44 AM
Original message
U.S. Concedes to Force-Feeding Detainees

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/22/international/middleeast/22gitmo.html?ei=5094&en=24c9f4b657ea9243&hp=&ex=1140670800&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print

February 22, 2006

U.S. Concedes to Force-Feeding Detainees

By ERIC SCHMITT and TIM GOLDEN

WASHINGTON, Feb. 21 — The military commander responsible for the American detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, confirmed Tuesday that officials there last month turned to more aggressive methods to deter prisoners who were carrying out long-term hunger strikes to protest their incarceration.

The commander, Gen. Bantz J. Craddock, head of the United States Southern Command, said soldiers at Guantánamo began strapping some of the detainees into "restraint chairs" to force-feed them and isolate them from one another after finding that some were deliberately vomiting or siphoning out the liquid they had been fed.

"It was causing problems because some of these hard-core guys were getting worse," General Craddock said at a breakfast meeting with reporters. Explaining the use of the restraint chairs, he added, "The way around that is you have to make sure that purging doesn't happen."

After The New York Times reported Feb. 9 that the military had begun using restraint chairs and other harsh methods, military spokesmen insisted that the procedures for dealing with the hunger strikes at Guantánamo had not changed. They also said they could not confirm that the chairs had been used......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. i think they knew they had to admit it sooner or later--




.....On Tuesday, General Craddock said he had reviewed the use of the restraint chairs, as had senior officials at the Department of Defense, and they concluded that the practice was "not inhumane." General Craddock left no doubt, however, that commanders had decided to try to make life less comfortable for the hunger strikers, and that the measures were seen as successful.

"Pretty soon it wasn't convenient, and they decided it wasn't worth it," he said of the hunger strikers. "A lot of the detainees said: 'I don't want to put up with this. This is too much of a hassle.' "

A spokesman for the Southern Command, Lt. Col. James Marshall, said that restraint chairs had been used in the feeding of 35 of the detainees so far, and that 3 were still being fed that way. He said the number of prisoners refusing to eat had fallen from 41 on Dec. 15 — when the restraint chairs were first used on a trial basis — to 5, according to a military spokesman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. So THAT part of the HRW and AI and ICRC reports were correct...
just all the other parts were wrong, the bits about the 70% of POWs being innocent, and all the murder & torture committed by US troops.

Uh huh.

I see.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. I almost went through the roof yesterday when I heard Dumbya
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 07:53 AM by AzDar
say that not selling our ports to the UAE would "damage our reputation with the Arab world".
Gee, Georgie the Feeb, do you suppose that with stories like these, and the banana-in-the-tailpipe photos coming out of Abu Ghraib, there is a sellout in existence that could make them LIKE us??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
5.  last month turned to more aggressive methods to deter prisoners
Like making them HEEL on a leash




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Thanx for the pic sai - haven't seen my avatar full size for quite a while
.
.
.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Its Lefty Lynndie
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 10:26 PM by saigon68
Queen of Abu Ghraib

She drags around the R*g heads with her left hand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh I know it's Ms. England
.
.
.

I made that avatar quite some time back . .

It's pretty representative of how the US Admin views people of Middle Eastern descent

That's my Canuk opinion anyhoo . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Good One eh
Yes, I wonder if the perky princess will have a book, ghost written in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Concedes" sounds so gracious
How about "admits," or "confesses?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. After denying this for... how many weeks now?
Why the fuck should anyone, anywhere, believe anything the Junta says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. How can these monsters do this?
They state that the problem was that the prisoners were getting worse. So, they force feed them under inhumane conditions to keep them alive or to break the hunger strike by inflicting pain during thr force feeding. This is criminal. They intend to do this day after day? They have lost their minds and morality.

It appears we are reaching a tipping point where this house of cards collapses. Impeachment is being heard more each passing day. I only fear what insane distractions they will try to preserve their power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Headline should contain the phrase, "Cmdrs are confirmed liars" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Their answer to the hunger strike was a form of torture.
This is an article which appeared earlier, among several others:
UNITED STATES: Guantanamo Bay prisoners tortured

Nicole Colson, Chicago

Force-feeding of prisoners on hunger strike at the US prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is being used as a form of torture, says a lawyer for several detainees.

According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, Julia Tarver, a New York City-based lawyer who represents at least three hunger strikers, returned from an October 2 trip to Guantanamo Bay with detailed information about the US military’s brutal use of force-feeding.

The Pentagon claims that “only” 25 of the prison camp’s approximately 500 prisoners are on hunger strike — with 22 being force-fed. But legal advocates say the number is likely higher. In September, as many as 210 prisoners were on a hunger strike begun on August 8 to protest their lack of legal rights, indefinite detentions and the brutal conditions under which they are held.

On September 28, military spokesperson Major Jeffrey Weir explained to the New York Times that involuntary feedings were designed to ensure that prisoners could not “starve themselves to the point of causing harm to themselves”. He insisted that the feedings were not “forced”, but “assisted”.

But in notes of interviews Tarver conducted with her clients — which she successfully fought to have declassified — prisoners described the feedings as a nightmarish punishment, with US troops violently inserting dirty nasogastric (NG) tubes up detainees’ noses and into their stomachs.

This resulted in prisoners “vomiting up substantial amounts of blood”, says Tarver’s notes. “When they vomited up blood, the soldiers mocked and cursed at them, and taunted them with statements like ‘Look what your religion has brought you’.”

Tarver was told that “detainees were verbally abused and insulted and were restrained from head to toe. They had shackles or other restraints on their arms, legs, waist, chest, knees, and head... With these restraints in place, they were given intravenous medication (often quite painfully, as inexperienced medical professionals seemed incapable of locating appropriate veins). Their arms were swollen from multiple attempts to stick them with IV needles... If detainees moved, they were hit in the chest/heart.”

According to what detainees told Tarver, “In front of Guantanamo physicians — including the head of the detainee hospital — the guards took NG tubes from one detainee, and with no sanitization whatsoever, reinserted it into the nose of a different detainee. When these tubes were reinserted, the detainees could see the blood and stomach bile from other detainees remaining on the tubes.”
(snip/...)
http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2005/647/647p19b.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. They admitted force feeding prisoners at a BREAKFAST MEETING???
Am I the only one who sees the sick irony there... ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC