Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inspections at Northwest Raise Questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:05 PM
Original message
Inspections at Northwest Raise Questions
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 02:33 PM by cal04
Reports filed by federal aviation inspectors during the first month of a strike by Northwest Airlines Corp.'s mechanics challenge assertions by executives that operations are running smoothly, according to a newspaper's review of the records. In a story for Sunday's editions, the Star Tribune newspaper reported that the inspection records — which were reviewed by two independent aviation experts — describe training deficiencies among replacement workers, thin staffing, maintenance blunders and mistakes in recording aircraft repairs.

It cites one incident in which mechanics failed to find a dead bird in the engine of a jet about to leave Memphis, Tenn., but a co-pilot spotted it before takeoff.In another case, it said inspectors watched replacement workers in Philadelphia work through the night to replace a brake. That job normally takes experienced mechanics less than three hours, the experts said. The Star Tribune reported that Northwest declined to discuss the substance of more than 100 reports it obtained.

On Sunday, Eagan-based Northwest said in a statement it had told the newspaper that the company considered it inappropriate for it to comment on FAA internal documents. "Northwest remains confident in the quality of its ongoing maintenance program. Our operation continues to run normally," the airline said. The statement also said the discovery of the dead bird came from the typical visual preflight safety inspection by the co-pilot, which would reveal such issues. Since the mechanics walked out Aug. 20, Northwest has used 1,200 replacements, a few hundred managers and outside vendors to maintain and repair its planes.

According to AMFA, about 40 of its members have crossed the picket lines. Since the strike began, Northwest has filed for bankruptcy protection, which typically triggers more FAA inspections at an airline to ensure maintenance is not compromised. After the strike, the FAA raised the number of personnel assigned to Northwest from 53 to about 80. The additional inspectors allow the FAA to conduct more spot checks and write more reports, but the agency still can't monitor all activities at the nation's fourth-largest airline, which operates 1,400 daily flights.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20051002/ap_on_bi_ge/northwest_inspection_records_3
http://startribune.com/stories/1778/5646290.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am not at all surprised
I recently flew NW from Bozeman MT to Boston, and three of the four planes for the trip had electrical problems. The first plane leaving Montana had an engine that wouldn't start! All four planes were A320s, so I don't know if they're naturally more prone to electrical issues, or if it's the mechanics....

I wasn't really down with crossing their picket line but 1) we already purchased non-refundable tickets and 2) if we chose another airline, we'd have to be routed through SLC and ATL rather than just MSP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sooooooo - y'all safer now - RIGHT??? - thank ur voters
.
.
.


"SuperPower" my ass

biggest f*ck-*p country in the world if'n ya ask me

But I's just a Canuk

Whadda I know . .

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Executives too corrupt to do business safely without regulation.
The executive managment should be imprisoned for this "religious jihad" against labor and the safety of their passengers -- all in pursuit of the mighty buck.

When I worked for a large bank in the early 70s, it was pointed out to me that one of the reasons the banking industry was so regulated was that bank executives were "too fucking stupid do do business responsibly without them." The S&L failures and banking failures since then, coupled with the obscene gulf between interest paid and interest collected shows just how true that was. We're seeing the same thing in the airline industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Excellent post!
If the Democratic party wants to stand for something again...

...that is, apart from signing on to patently stupid wars and promoting outsourcing and offering tax cuts to under-taxed corporations...

...then it could make regulation its creed. Regulation, specifically, of our deranged capitalists.

I'm just sayin': spineless Bush-lite isn't going to save our beleaguered land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. deregulation
it really has worked out well hasn`t it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krupskaya Donating Member (689 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. What do you expect from SCABS?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC