Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mass. Governor Vetoes Contraception Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:05 PM
Original message
Mass. Governor Vetoes Contraception Bill
Mass. Governor Vetoes Contraception Bill

By THEO EMERY
The Associated Press
Monday, July 25, 2005; 9:08 PM

BOSTON -- Gov. Mitt Romney vetoed a bill Monday expanding access to emergency contraception, angering abortion rights advocates while pleasing anti-abortion activists crucial to a 2008 presidential run.

The veto could end up being overturned by lawmakers because the bill passed with veto-proof margins in both the House and Senate.

The Republican governor said the so-called "morning after pill" is already widely available without a mandate from the state. He also was concerned because the hormone regimen can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in a woman's uterus.

"If it only dealt with contraception, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But it also in some cases terminates a life after conception," he said.
(snip/...)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/25/AR2005072500965.html
(Free registration required)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, those undiferentiated blobs of cells will CRY!
Their SOULS will SUFFER! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. More Christian "Every Sperm Is Sacred" Bullshit...
... it's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Nope - Politics 101
this is the posturing standard for every GOP Presidential candidate who doesn't want to appear "too moderate" for the true-believers. Gov. Pataki in NY has been holding off signing a bill on access to "day after" contraception while he visits Iowa and ponders his opportunities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. If only they were so concerned about the kids who are already here... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Romney's learned a lot about the symbolic veto lately
Several months ago, the legislature *unanimously* overrode one of his vetos. This will be overridden, too. It's just to score Mitt some points with presidential voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I think they have over-ridden EVERY veto
Romney actually vetoed a bill that would prevent a company from building a trash-transfer station next to a reservoir.

That was over-ridden.

But then some Libertarian I spoke to said, "Well, people should exercise the personal responsibility to drink bottled water."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why can't people research
what they say??

<"...it also in some cases terminates a life after conception," he said.
(snip/...)>


So does the Pill!

Shoot...maybe I shouldn't point that out...there goes the Pill...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That is incorrect.
They prevent conception. They do not terminate a life after conception, as you put it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. no, my understanding is
that the pill works to prevent ovulation, limit sperm motility by altering conditions in the uterus, and sometimes prevents implantation of a fertilized egg.

Fertilization is conception, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Yes, but pregnancy is something different
pregnancy is medically defined as beginning when the embryo is implanted in the uterine wall.

No implantation, no pregnancy.

And the most ironic/tragic/stupid part of this is that by taking the morning after pill, you DECREASE the chances of expelling a fertilized egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. Not according to medical literature
Conception occurs after the fertilized egg implants on the uterine wall, not before. So EC and BCP are contraceptives. Period.

If you have an alternative view of when conception occurs it has no basis in medical science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aesclepius Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Actually, That Is Not Correct.
Fertilization generally occurs in the oviduct prior to uterine implantation, not after. In fact, implantation is a complex process that is actually initiated by the zygote (the fertilized ovum) 2 or 3 days after its entrance into the uterus and consists of three phases: adhesion, penetration, and invasion. The process requires an interplay between the endometrium of the uterus and the developing embryo; therefore, conception after implantation is not likely to occur.

I'm not sure what medical literature you're referring to, but it's, on the whole, incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. That's the question - but exactly when
there's no one point that can easily be identified. Great op-ed piece on the science of it in yesterday's Hartford Courant. (I'll look for it and edit if I can find)

Sperm meets egg? Sperm enters egg? DNA meets? Combines? Cell division starts? Implantation? Differentiated brain cells? Brain activity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. So can Advil
There are a whole bunch of things that can cause a fertilized egg to fail to implant. The majority of fertilized eggs do not implant at all, which is why doctors don't consider a woman pregnant until the zygote has actually implanted.

Tucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
38. so what's the big deal
about embryonic stem cell research then?? Those little embryos all sitting in a frozen tube somewhere, NOT implanting themselves anywhere.

They can't have it both ways...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in a woman's uterus
That's the freaking point, you freaking right-wing moron!!!

Oh my god, please let these right wing asswipes become an endangered species!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Yes, but you see, the tiny little spirit...
> "can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in a woman's uterus"
> That's the freaking point, you freaking right-wing moron!!!

Yes, but you see, the tiny little spirit flies into the ovum the
instant the enzymes on the sperm's head start dissolving their
way into the ovum, so if we don't let that teeny tiny little
now-enspirited ovum implant, a *HUMAN LIFE* (it apparently has
to be shouted; it's in the "Pro-Life propaganda handbook) has
been lost!

Well, maybe when the 23 chromosomes finally zip themselves
together for the first time; the propaganda book seems a
little unclear on that point; it's one of those "sciuntific"
things, don'cha know, kinda like "evolution".

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. The morning after pill is NOT abortion! Stupid republican fucktards! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. No amount of Plan B can terminate a pregnancy
If the zygote is already implanted in the uterus, no amount of Plan B will induce a chemical abortion.
Once again, science is ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good grief! Did the Mass. electorate go temporarily insane?
How did they let this guy into the governor's mansion?

Just because William Weld was a halfway-decent Republican governor doesn't mean that such a thing could ever happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Mittens ran as a moderate reformer.
Also the Democrats ran a weak candidate against him.

Romney promised to expand access to emergency contraception
when he ran for governor in 2002. He reassured voters
that he would not try to restrict abortion.

Now that he is running for president, he has gone
completely right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
39. He got there because he was good looking and that's what Rethugs
care out. They don't need to think or know any thing because the party will tell them all they need to know. They just need an empty suit to fill his shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. It is so obvious that he's out of here
everything he does has nothing to do with Massachusetts... he's just trying to please the assholes in the Bible Belt, couldn't care less about what people here want. Why he was voted into office is beyond me, I do not understand how time and time again we elect another republican shithead who uses the office as a stepping stone. None of them had any intention of actually serving the state. A microcosm of the USA, voting against one's own best interests, for inexplicable reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. An unimplanted egg is not a person, you freak!
Until the fertilized egg implants, there IS NO PREGNANCY, therefore there is no potential human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
17. How did MA get such a numbnut for a
governor? He is predictably disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Mass routinely votes Republican for governor in the hopes of...
...cutting their taxes. Barbara Anderson and her CLT (Citizens
for Limited Taxation, what did you think I meant?) has convinced
everyone in Massachusetts that they've been absolutely impoverished
by the appallingly-high tax rates (as they drive to their $150K+/year
jobs from their $1M+ houses in their $40K Lexi).

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Hey, not all of us make that sort of salary!
I make a decent (but well under 150k!) salary and can't afford to even buy a house, much less a Lexus.

You're right about Barbara Anderson though, that women is obsessive in her pursuit of zero taxation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. I know, but...
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 08:45 AM by Tesha
> Hey, not all of us make that sort of salary!"
>
> I make a decent (but well under 150k!) salary and can't afford
> to even buy a house, much less a Lexus.

I know, but you probably don't vote Republican either so you
obviously don't fit into my somewhat-hyperbolic generalization
of "everyone", even though a majority (proven by Mitt's election)
does.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. Can they overrride his veto?? Who needs him anyway?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. As the "Magic-8 Ball" sas: "It is a certainty" (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
21. "Mass. Governor Vetoes Contraception Bill"
Mitt is just the Court Jester in our state. It will be overturned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Romney just declared himself "prolife".
He wrote and op-ed "Why I vetoed contraception bill" in today's
Boston Globe:

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/07/26/why_i_vetoed_contraception_bill/


In 2002, he said that he supported the subsance of Row vs. Wade.
Now he's against it and opposes abortion "except in cases of
incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother."

He says he only went along with pro-choice becuase Massachusetts
is a lost cause. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. He only went Pro-Choice because he's a typical hypocritical Republican.
He'd say anything to get elected and as long as what he's saying
includes the magic phrase "cut your taxes", people will swallow it.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
26. How the hell does a jackass like him get elected in Mass?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
28. ACTIVIST GOVERNOR
Repeat after me...ACTIVIST GOVERNOR. Mittens, how goes THAT sound? The Mass House overwhelmingly and the Mass Senate unanimously voted FOR the EC Bill. The citizens of Massachusetts want it. Bye Bye Mittens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. They don't care
if it's attached or not! Since when do they care about science? It's a fertilized egg, period. That means it's a life. So to them, the morning after pill AND birth control pills can potentially cause abortion.

Mark my words: They're going to make the pill illegal when they outlaw abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. Another Pointless Veto from the Mittster.
His veto will be overridden.

His pandering to the right is SO OBVIOUS to us MA denizens.

And stop asking why MA voted for him. He campaigned as a moderate, and his Dem opponent was extremely weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
36. Please tell me the people of Mass. are going to vote this guy out
next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
37. How in the hell did this guy ever get elected in a progressive state?
Send the idiot back to Utah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
40. Mass. Gov. Vetoes Law on Pill, Takes Aim at Roe v. Wade
The Boston Globe



Boston, July 26--Three years after expressing support for "the substance" of Roe v. Wade, Governor Mitt Romney today criticizes the landmark ruling that legalized abortion and says the states should decide separately whether to allow it.

Romney outlines his abortion position in an opinion article today in The Boston Globe, a day after he vetoed a bill that would expand access to the so-called "morning after" pill, a high dose of hormones that women can take to prevent pregnancy up to five days after sex.
In a written response to a questionnaire for candidates in 2002, Romney told Planned Parenthood that he supported "the substance of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade," according to the group. Today, Romney describes himself as a "pro-life governor" who wishes "the laws of our nation could reflect that view." Calling the country "divided over abortion," he says states "should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate." <snip>

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/171/story_17166_1.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
41. Mitt's political career is over
Go back to Utah, you fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC