Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poland Says It Was Mistaken (no new French Missiles in Iraq)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 12:32 PM
Original message
Poland Says It Was Mistaken (no new French Missiles in Iraq)
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAH28FVDLD.html

Poland Says It Was Mistaken in Report That Troops Found Newly Built French Missiles in Iraq
By Beata Pasek
Associated Press Writer

WARSAW, Poland (AP) - After a protest from French President Jacques Chirac, Poland said Saturday it had been mistaken in reporting that its troops found new French-made anti-aircraft misiles in central Iraq. Chirac swiftly denied selling Iraq weapons in violation of the U.N. weapons embargo against Saddam Hussein's regime. The claims, he said, "are as false today as they were yesterday." An aide to the Polish prime minister said an initial report that the Roland missiles found by Polish troops days ago were produced in 2003 was incorrect. France said it stopped producing any type of Roland missile in 1993. Prime Minister Leszek Miller met with Chirac twice to explain the mistake, said the aide, Tadeusz Iwinski. The two leaders were in Rome on Saturday for a European Union summit. "There can be no 2003 missiles since these missiles have not been made for 15 years," Chirac told reporters in Rome. "Polish soldiers confused things. I told ... Miller so frankly - friendly but firmly." <snip>
The Polish defense minister, Jerzy Szmajdzinski, "expressed his regrets" for the mistake, a ministry statement said.
The report first came in a statement by a ministry spokesman to Polish state television that the troops uncovered French-made Roland missiles in the town of Hilla, in the zone of central Iraq where the Poles lead a peacekeeping force. A ministry statement said the missiles were destroyed on Wednesday. Since Saddam's fall in April, U.S. troops and journalists have seen Roland missiles at some weapons sites. France long had close ties to Iraq that included lucrative weapons deals. Paris supplied arms, in exchange for oil, during the eight-year Iran-Iraq war. The French Foreign Ministry statement Saturday said that Roland 1 missiles and their launchers were exported to Iraq in 1980-81, whole Roland 2 missiles were exported for three years, from 1983 to 1986. France stopped making Roland 2s in 1988 and Roland 3s in 1993, it said. The French ministry emphasized that France has not authorized the sale of weapons, or even spare parts, to Iraq since after July 1990. <snip>

The United States stopped producing the Roland-type weapon in 1981.
AP-ES-10-04-03 1236EDT

This story can be found at: http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAH28FVDLD.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I'll have to print this out,
'cuz i know that when i see my AM radio-listening, first-paragraph-only-reading, president*-shrub-believing friend on Monday, he will have only seen the original story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That's the thing isn't it?
The damage is already done. We can't possibly run around with this article to ALL the believing masses. Mission accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not quite on topic but interesting
<<snip>>

Social psychology textbooks list several ways in which audiences can be deceived by propaganda.
First of all, audiences are more likely to accept an idea if they believe it was heard inadvertently; in other words, there is a natural tendency to resist a message that is presented in an assertive way, while there will be far less negative reaction if the audience hears the same theme in a context that is relatively "matter-of-fact."

Audiences are also more likely to actually change their opinions if they receive a message from a variety of sources that mutually reinforce one another. Similarly, people tend to approve of a statement made by someone who is in some way similar to them, an expert on the topic under discussion, or one who begins by expressing an opinion with which the listener (or viewer or reader) strongly agrees.

Under some circumstances, propaganda messages can be made more potent by incorporating opposing arguments in a way that tends to discredit them, while at the same time giving the audience the impression that it is hearing both side of the debate.

In large operations, propagandists often stimulate changes in attitudes by generating a "band-wagon effect" -- creating the false impression that a particular set of beliefs is more widely accepted than it really is. And where a specific behavioral change is the intended goal of a communications campaign, it is extremely useful to get members of the target group either to express the idea publicly (thereby committing themselves to it) or to engage in the desired conduct in some way short of compulsion (so that they assume "ownership" of the idea). In either case, the tendency is to continue to defend the opinion or action and in so doing to internalize the propaganda.

<<snip>>

best bit from:
http://www.africa2000.com/PNDX/theory.htm

there seem to be a list of articles here:
http://www.africa2000.com/PNDX/plist.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Picking on the French again.
As Gene McCarthy said, "Sorry I was right."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like a Polish Joke to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Polish deployment is a sore issue in Poland
Against a tide of popular opinion, the Polish government decided to send troops to Iraq. Once they got there the Polish soldiers found themselves without any working equipment or weapons. Their old Soviet-era radios could not even transmit in the frequencies used by the US. The US had to issue them brand new equipment.

The same horror story was repeated with the small Latvian contingent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Non-existent
missiles and 1 vial of botulism.
This hunt for WMDs is damned expensive.
LOL the Polish joke, no further comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Typical
announce during the week when most people will hear it, retract on Saturday when no one is paying attention. Is it any wonder that the public has fallen for so many lies? You have to be really paying attention to keep up with this crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well that is that story debunked
So now all we have to do is wait a week or so for Faux News to be reporting that 500 brand new state of the art missles have been found in Iraq.

(I just looked at WMD in Kuwait thread)

It would seem that you have to run a preliminary propaganda article first before you push it home with the big story at a later date.

The preliminary article also gives you the oppotunity to test the reaction to the story, to see how successful it is going to be. Sort of like businesses market testing a new product on a selected group of people first before launching it to the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Poor Poles. They were only saying what the Americans told them
to say in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Poor Poles. They were only saying what the Germans told them.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Yes, as if Centcom hadn't okayed...
Edited on Sun Oct-05-03 02:55 AM by Paschall

...the Polish announcement of this "find." Riiight! I mean the Poles are under US command, are they not? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. But, but...I saw PICTURES of them on MSRNC today! With "made 2003"
stenciled right on their sides! They did look a little rusty, though...
I guess all that rain in the desert does that...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who the heck is "Roland" anyway?
And why does he have a missile named after him?

Will we someday see the SU5000 "Dick"?

Or the Raytheon XR "Condi"?

I might be willing to bet that we will soon see a "Wolf" named weapon, in a sorta subtle prop to Wolfowitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Roland was a mythical French hero
so it's the equivalent of the British calling a missle 'Lancelot' or 'Gallahad' (and the Royal Navy has used the latter as a ship name).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Wow, cool. Thank you.
We have a "mythical" hero also. "Ronald".

At least it's a myth that he was a hero.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-03 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. "The Song of Roland," 11th century French poem
First great epic poem in French, based on actual 8th century French military hero, Hrodland (ie Roland), Count of the Marches of Brittany.

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/roland-ohag.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Boy Who Cried “Wolf!”
Edited on Sat Oct-04-03 03:17 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC