Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Rules Against 13 People in Lawsuit Over Elian Gonzalez Raid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:01 PM
Original message
Judge Rules Against 13 People in Lawsuit Over Elian Gonzalez Raid
MIAMI (AP) - Thirteen people who were tear-gassed during the raid to seize Elian Gonzalez five years ago lost a lawsuit Friday in which they had sought $3.25 million in damages from the government.

U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore issued a 19-page decision saying that the demonstrators and bystanders failed to show enough credible evidence that federal agents' use of force during the raid was "unreasonable under the circumstances."

The 13 people claimed they had been sprayed at close range while on their own property or behind barricades. Three neighbors testified that an agent gassed them without warning from 2 to 4 feet away as they stood alone in their fenced front yards.

Justice Department attorneys had said the tear-gassing of bystanders was "an unavoidable consequence" during the April 22, 2000, raid, which led to the 6-year-old boy's eventual return to Cuba with his father.

more…
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBG4Q1ZE8E.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another much to do over nothing
Remember the 24/7 coverage of the Elian Gonzalez story? Who cares now? You could say the same of Terry Schaivo. Who really cares after a few months. Cable news grabs these stories, milks them for days and then they are gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Collateral Damage. Move on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Welcome to Miami.
Edited on Fri May-06-05 06:11 PM by mia
Don't forget the tear-gassing of bystanders during the FTAA meeting on Nov. 20..."police officers in full riot gear {used it} against a crowd estimated at 8,000 people, mostly union members and retirees."

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1130-07.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Neener Neener Neener!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now that what, 5 years ago?
Forgive us if nobody cares anymore, but a lot more important stuff has happened since then.

You guys lost. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Judge Rules Against 13 in Elian Raid Suit
May 7, 2005

MIAMI (AP) - A federal judge Friday ruled against awarding damages to 13 people who were tear-gassed by immigration agents during the raid to seize 6-year-old Elian Gonzalez in April 2000.

U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore issued a 19-page decision saying that the demonstrators and bystanders failed to show enough credible evidence that federal officers' use of force during the raid was "unreasonable under the circumstances."

The 13 people had sued the government for $3.25 million, claiming they had lingering injuries after they were sprayed at close range while on their own property or behind barricades. Three neighbors testified that an agent gassed them without warning from 2 to 4 feet away as they stood alone in their fenced front yards.

But the judge agreed with the government's argument that officers did not use excessive force and that the plaintiffs failed to show that they were sprayed at close range. The April 22, 2000, raid led to the boy's eventual return to Cuba with his father.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4988986,00.html





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. ever been tear gassed?
Well, I have. And, yes, I've read about it's effects. Only a handful of people suffer serious health problems after exposure to CS or CN. And only a handful of those suffer permanent ones (up to, and rarely including death).

For everyone else, being tear gassed is merely acutely uncomfortable for a short period of time. Sure, your eyes, nose, and throat burn. Sometimes you :puke:. But you're okay in a couple of hours. You sure aren't suffering to the tune of $250,000 each. These 13 plaintiffs are either wimps, or greedy, or both. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. Judge Rules Against 13 in Elian Raid Suit
Judge Rules Against 13 in Elian Raid Suit

Saturday May 7, 2005 1:31 AM


By JENNIFER KAY

Associated Press Writer

MIAMI (AP) - A federal judge Friday ruled against awarding damages to 13 people who were tear-gassed by immigration agents during the raid to seize 6-year-old Elian Gonzalez in April 2000.

U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore issued a 19-page decision saying that the demonstrators and bystanders failed to show enough credible evidence that federal officers' use of force during the raid was ``unreasonable under the circumstances.''

The 13 people had sued the government for $3.25 million, claiming they had lingering injuries after they were sprayed at close range while on their own property or behind barricades. Three neighbors testified that an agent gassed them without warning from 2 to 4 feet away as they stood alone in their fenced front yards.

But the judge agreed with the government's argument that officers did not use excessive force and that the plaintiffs failed to show that they were sprayed at close range. The April 22, 2000, raid led to the boy's eventual return to Cuba with his father.
(snip/...)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4988953,00.html





Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
brought the kid a toy battleship
in Miami.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. WOW, this is one of the FEW times I ever approved of all the firepower!
Edited on Sat May-07-05 04:44 AM by dicksteele
With that case, with the little boy in the house surrounded by crowds of "supporters" who had vowed to 'resist'....

I really think the GOVERNMENT TROOPS played their hand perfectly; Their 'show of force' actually AVOIDED bloodshed.

I have no doubt that some of those front-yard 'supporters' were armed. They SAID they were armed, and willing to use their guns.

If 2 or 3 plainclothes types had arrived in a 4-door Dodge to take the child into custody,
those ARMED folks might have felt BRAVE enough to pull their guns and go postal....

But all the armored Stormtroopers walked right through the MOB and extracted the lad without a shot being fired.

And that was the IDEA.
That crowd would have ripped apart a caseworker from SocialServices in a heartbeat...but they weren't stupid enough to pull a revolver against a dozen armored drones packing MP5s...

and so EVERYONE lived to tell the tale. Color that SUCCESFUL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Most people aren't aware that the house behind the Miami relatives..
Most people aren't aware that the house behind the Miami relatives house was raided just 30 seconds before agents raided the house with Elian. They busted around 10 armed goons (who were acting as "security") and confiscated 15 or so weapons (AK-47s, AR-15s, many handguns, etc). Some of the goons had felony records and were not allowed to possess weapons.

This fact got little coverage, with only a mention or two in the Miami Herald.

It was damned lucky that all worked out well because it could have turned into a serious gun fight.




www.stopbolton.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC