Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FLASH: Concern as Georgia GOP rep downplays terror planes:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:11 PM
Original message
FLASH: Concern as Georgia GOP rep downplays terror planes:
(Moderator this is breaking on Raw Story - no article yet)

FLASH: Concern as Georgia GOP rep downplays terror planes: 'Most of us don't believe that we will ever see an airline hit a building, because the passengers won't allow it. And if an airline is blown up in the air, that is a very bad circumstance for 200 or 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe. I would rather spend these fortunes looking... for ...
It is my view that no airplane will ever hit a commercial building... Soon...

http://rawstory.com/

Any idea which GA Rep said this and where/to whom did he/she say this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nobody would have ever believed that terrorists would...
C. Rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Ah Yes C. Rice
Queen of Ugly



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, I don't think there's going to be another hijack either
The Kevlar and steel door is going to prevent that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll Take A Guess
Zell Miller?

And don't tell me he isn't a GOP rep, because I call bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think Zell's still in the hospital.
Notice the typical GOP abuse of the English language. He calls an airplane an "airline."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Congressman's quip regarding airplanes raises some concern
Chairman Christopher Cox (R-CA): The gentleman from Georgia

Rep. John Linder (R-GA): Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Umm. We could probably spend, the entire budget of the United States, on the airline industry. And still be missing some pieces. Now, most of us don't believe that we will ever see an airline hit a building, because the passengers won't allow it. And if an airline is blown up in the air, that is a very bad circumstance for 200 or 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe. Rep. Linder: I would rather spend these fortunes looking for a catastrophe . . . for nuclear weapons. (mumbling and inaudible)

Chairman Cox: Is the gentleman's microphone turned on?

Rep. Linder: Yes.

Rep. Linder: We could spend everything we have protecting airplanes, and still not protect everything. Umm. It is my view that no airplane will ever hit a commercial building -- which is the only value they have in taking out large numbers of people. It is my view that passengers won't allow that to happen. But it is entirely possible that an airplane will blow up in the air, with some (inaudible) or warning today, or some other technique. But that is a very bad circumstance for about 200, 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe.

Rep. Linder: And if we are going to spend all this money, we ought to be thinking about the 1 million, or 2 million-person catastrophe that could be caused by a nuclear device, or a biological device. I think . . . we are doing an awful lot, and maybe too much, on airlines right now. Spending $5 billion dollars a year looking for toenail clippers and box cutters. We should be looking for nuclear devices and I think we should not spend all of our money on the airline industry . . .

RAW STORY HOPES TO POST AN AUDIO CLIP LATER TODAY... DEVELOPING....
http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/linder_comments_terror_airplanes_429.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Here's an interesting Raw Story reader comment :
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 12:42 PM by CottonBear
"Yeah.. let's not spend billions on making sure thousands of people don't die from a comercial building hit.. no biggy.. never mind that a comercial airliner with a nuke on it, over a city, -is- the catastrophe he's talking about. And, it's perhaps the ONLY way to get an air-burst of a nuke over US soil.. na, let's not spend billions on that.. let's increase the billions (up to $12 bill last I heard) we're giving to gas and oil companies.. the COEs and Board Members need that money something fierce.. no need to protect citizens from something that has been PROVED to have been a tactic already..
Savantster | 04.29.05 - 1:41 pm | # "

(John Linder is a representative for the district adjacent to my congressional district. Thank god that I have a Democratic rep and not one of these GOP morans.)

edit: I just don't know what to make of Linder's statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds hauntingly familiar to "Bring It On"
He calls blowing up at 30,000 feet and burning as you fall to the ground a bad circumstance?

I personally have seen a cockpit door swing open without anybody touching it. Nothing's foolproof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well in a way he is right
While nothing is checked at the ports a gazillion dollars is being spent confiscating lighters from airline passengers. A lot worse can happen than a plane crash...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Randi Rhodes mentined the lack of port security
and possible solutions. (X-ray devices on the cranes) Most of those shipping containers that get loaded onto trucks and trains are never checked or screened or x-rayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC