Chairman Christopher Cox (R-CA): The gentleman from Georgia
Rep. John Linder (R-GA): Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Umm. We could probably spend, the entire budget of the United States, on the airline industry. And still be missing some pieces. Now, most of us don't believe that we will ever see an airline hit a building, because the passengers won't allow it. And if an airline is blown up in the air, that is a very bad circumstance for 200 or 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe. Rep. Linder: I would rather spend these fortunes looking for a catastrophe . . . for nuclear weapons. (mumbling and inaudible)
Chairman Cox: Is the gentleman's microphone turned on?
Rep. Linder: Yes.
Rep. Linder: We could spend everything we have protecting airplanes, and still not protect everything. Umm. It is my view that no airplane will ever hit a commercial building -- which is the only value they have in taking out large numbers of people. It is my view that passengers won't allow that to happen. But it is entirely possible that an airplane will blow up in the air, with some (inaudible) or warning today, or some other technique. But that is a very bad circumstance for about 200, 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe.
Rep. Linder: And if we are going to spend all this money, we ought to be thinking about the 1 million, or 2 million-person catastrophe that could be caused by a nuclear device, or a biological device. I think . . . we are doing an awful lot, and maybe too much, on airlines right now. Spending $5 billion dollars a year looking for toenail clippers and box cutters. We should be looking for nuclear devices and I think we should not spend all of our money on the airline industry . . .
RAW STORY HOPES TO POST AN AUDIO CLIP LATER TODAY... DEVELOPING....
http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/linder_comments_terror_airplanes_429.htm