Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Data Backing Iraq War Called Uncertain, Weak (Sunday WashPost)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:08 PM
Original message
Data Backing Iraq War Called Uncertain, Weak (Sunday WashPost)
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 08:15 PM by Newsjock
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10928-2003Sep27.html

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 28, 2003; Page A01
WASHINGTON — Leaders of the House intelligence committee have criticized the U.S. intelligence community for using largely outdated, ``circumstantial'' and ``fragmentary'' information with ``too many uncertainties'' to conclude that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaida.

Top members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which spent four months combing through 19 volumes of classified material used by the Bush administration to make its case for the war on Iraq, found ``significant deficiencies'' in the community's ability to collect fresh intelligence on Iraq, and said it had to rely on ``past assessments'' dating to when U.N. inspectors left Iraq in 1998 and on ``some new `piecemeal' intelligence,'' both of which ``were not challenged as a routine matter.''

``The absence of proof that chemical and biological weapons and their related development programs had been destroyed was considered proof that they continued to exist,'' the two committee members said in their letter Thursday to CIA Director George Tenet. The Washington Post obtained a copy this weekend.


more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annagull Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whoa, it's war now!
The CIA is asking for an investigation of the WH, the Congress is laying the bogus intel at Tenet's feet. This is going to get very interesting now. Glad to see the editors at the WP have finally run this on the front page. Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tenet's the sacrificial lamb.
He's a Clinton appointee.

No other heads will roll.

Remember who has the majority on that committee.

It's DeLay's creature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Tenet must have serious dirt on those devils
remember when he looked like he was going to take the fall for the 16 words crap? An "apology" that actually vindicated him kinda?

maybe something to do with 9/11 warnings, maybe the Iraq war WMD fabrication of evidene, maybe he just picked up some useful info on the Bushies just by doing their filthy work day in, day out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a vindication of the peace activists . . .
. . . and a condemnation of the brain dead idiots that condemned us as unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBadVodoDaddy Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. huh?
``The absence of proof that chemical and biological weapons and their related development programs had been destroyed was considered proof that they continued to exist,''

I admit I am just a old Indiana boy, but something is wrong with that thinking, yes I know duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Same old
Goss and Harmon are still arguing. Guess who will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Duh, ya think?
Of course we knew this BEFORE Bush's thugs invaded Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC