Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missile Defense Comments by Canada's New U.S. Envoy Spark Uproar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:00 AM
Original message
Missile Defense Comments by Canada's New U.S. Envoy Spark Uproar
By Beth Duff-Brown Associated Press Writer
Published: Feb 23, 2005

TORONTO (AP) - Prime Minister Paul Martin was expected to announce later in the week that Canada will not sign on to the U.S. ballistic missile plan, after his newly appointed ambassador to Washington triggered a row by suggesting Ottawa had already joined the contentious program.
Most Canadians are opposed to the missile defense shield, which is in the midst of testing interceptors capable of taking out incoming missiles. Some believe the umbrella, when fully implemented, could lead to the weaponization of space and an international arms race.

The Foreign Ministry insisted Ambassador Frank McKenna's comments on Tuesday referred to a previous military agreement, not the proposed missile shield. That was not good enough for opposition politicians, who said Martin had betrayed Canadians by "secretly" signing on to the shield program.

A spokesman for the U.S. Northern Command, Michael Kucharek, said there has been no change in Canada's involvement in U.S. ballistic missile defense programs.



more:
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBJC7B5J5E.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Three cheers for the sanity of Paul Martin !
Canadians are smart not to want weapons in space.
If only some of their smarts would rub off on the US!!
O8)
:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, we need Canuck smarts drifting
down on the Chinook winds.

"Trickle Down intelligence?" :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. When I think of missile defense shield, I think of two castaways on
an island no more than 100 feet across, completely covered with trees, threatening each other to burn them in order to claim the shade for themselves. The planet just won't accept this sort of insult. I don't see it happening.... not without serious repercussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. hmmm - gotta watch the wording carefully here - -
.
.
.

I just moved 50 miles AWAY from our northern NORAD site in North Bay, Ontario - where we USED to have nukes - they were supposed to have been removed decades ago . .

The site is still active, and VERY restricted - I drove cab for awhile in 2002/2003, and delivering staff to the site, you can't get even close to the entrance - drop them off in a parking lot, and they go through an underground tunnel to the entrance, and through various security checks before they even get to the front "door" (a little 19 TON door that is)

Statements as oblique as "there has been no change in Canada's involvement in U.S. ballistic missile defense programs" unnerve me somewhat . .

No Change - OK -

from what date ?? :shrug:



Interesting read on Canada's Ballistic Missile Policy/Participation, and links to more info - clik on image below -



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC