|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
| vroomvroom
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:05 PM Original message |
| Why Obama will Lose in 2012 (Objective Analysis) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liberal N proud
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. WOW` |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LoZoccolo
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. The author can't just take a list of reasons that he wants Obama to lose |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ladjf
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Your prediction might be wrong due to the fact that the Republican |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| joeybee12
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. That, i think, is what will get Obama re-elected...nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tridim
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. I unrecced at sentence #2. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gateley
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 13. Agree -- I don't believe that about the majority of Dems. Problem is, the system |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flamingdem
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. UNREC both parties out of touch w/reality same amount? yeah, right nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shiver
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Oh, I see a small mistake there... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Akoto
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Anyone who sees no difference between the parties doesn't live my life. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HughBeaumont
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. I would think NOT having widespread WI, OH, FL, NJ, IN, etc would be reason enough. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CakeGrrl
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Unrec. The author is just waving around another opinion. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Peacetrain
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. No, just the opposite.. The GOP just cooked its own goose |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| arcane1
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. I fail to see, based on this, how a republican could win n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProSense
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. "He has no visible core beliefs beyond a vague sense that the Federal government and its extension" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Richardo
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. I fell asleep when I hit the word 'Empire' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sharp_stick
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Where in the world did you drop |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| okieinpain
|
Thu Apr-07-11 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. man that was some of the most funniest shit I've read since |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JoePhilly
|
Thu Apr-07-11 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Plus he hates puppies!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NYC Liberal
|
Thu Apr-07-11 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. Talk about nonsense. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProSense
|
Thu Apr-07-11 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. Here: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JoePhilly
|
Thu Apr-07-11 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Having to say "Objective Analysis" is like when Newt Gingrich says "Frankly ... " |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zoeisright
|
Thu Apr-07-11 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. Objective my ass. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Drunken Irishman
|
Thu Apr-07-11 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. This is about as objective as FOX. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muriel_volestrangler
|
Thu Apr-07-11 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. The author spends the entire article turning his first sentence into a lie |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| center rising
|
Thu Apr-07-11 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Nothing like being a Debbie downer. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ClarkUSA
|
Thu Apr-07-11 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. Thanks for sharing this totally unsubstantiated bullshit op-ed garbage from Business Insider. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tarheel_Dem
|
Thu Apr-07-11 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Every once in a while, one slips through. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onenote
|
Thu Apr-07-11 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. That was a chuckle |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Thu Apr-07-11 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Welcome to DU |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fascisthunter
|
Thu Apr-07-11 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. I Accidently Unrecced you post... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| retread
|
Thu Apr-07-11 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. "Objective Analysis" Hahahahahahaha, thanks for the laugh!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wisteria
|
Thu Apr-07-11 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. I believe Pres. Obama will be reelected and he has a much better chance than the others |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Logical
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. We have to support Obama in 2012. At least vote for him! n-t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jefferson_dem
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. Biggest crock of dung I've read here in a long, long while. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| frazzled
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. "He does not understand economics" -- from a "novelist" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wyldwolf
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. I'll wager you $100. - to your favorite charity - that Obama wins by a substantial margin |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ikonoklast
|
Thu Apr-07-11 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. Oh, it's you again. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ncteechur
|
Thu Apr-07-11 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. Don't come posting some piece of shit moronic crap. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AtomicKitten
|
Thu Apr-07-11 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. LOL. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jeanpalmer
|
Thu Apr-07-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. He's trying to be Ronald Reagan |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlueIris
|
Thu Apr-07-11 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. "If..Obama had fought for fundamental structural reforms he..would still have support." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leftynyc
|
Fri Apr-08-11 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. This is crap |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WI_DEM
|
Fri Apr-08-11 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 43. Here is my objective analysis--he will win in 2012--why? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WI_DEM
|
Fri Apr-08-11 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
| 44. objective? and then you say Weiner, Grayson or Feingold should run |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC