|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:08 AM Original message |
Are these Florida Precinct Reports a smoking gun or not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr Rabble
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. how people still argue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well...I'd imagine the chances of that happening randomly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. I Can't Seem to Find Them on the Site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Use the drop down list to list the county |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The percentages that match are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 12:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Just a thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Let's analyze this - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I did want an answer and I didn't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Here it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. I really do not see how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Not a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Once again, qwghlmian, you go are off in left field. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Read what I wrote - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. You must account for two improbabilities - and you fail to do so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. THE ADJACENT PRECINCT NUMBERS. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN IT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. FEELING SMART RIGHT NOW? JUST CALCULATE THIS FOR US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. IS THAT YOUR ANSWER? COMPUTE THE PROBABILITY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. As I said - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. OH, I SEE YOU HAVE HIT A WALL. YOU ARE BACKTRACKING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:39 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. What facts that are in evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:53 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Go ahead. Show me. Point it out. Oh, we are off by TWO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:07 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. dupe delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. You are getting ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Poisson or gravity model? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
59. A little set theory problem (sixth grade math I believe) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #59 |
72. Any chance you could come up with a number... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:24 AM Response to Reply #72 |
124. Yeah, I could not get in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #124 |
135. Thank you Mike! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:54 PM Response to Reply #135 |
138. Chi, look at post # 132. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. :), yes, Chi, look at post #132 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. (Chi reaches for his stun gun)..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #140 |
143. Instead reach for my post # 141. Make it 3800. And the prob is still low |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Actually, I think those odds are lower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I was going by the original poster's findings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. This is why I keep saying map the data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Short explanation (tinfoil hat back on) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abbiehoff
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Although these are reported as precinct numbers, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Very interesting possibility!!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. read my analysis of your findings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Yes, if it is, other states should have similar results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. Basic math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. See my corrected analysis - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
60. Correction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brindis_desala
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. If memory serves a DUer found similar "twins" in OHIO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Mean one voting station serving two precincts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Repub numbers don't match.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
39. If memory serves me right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. Possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Actually 8) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's Taking Me Awhile to Understand What is Being Suspected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
34. Established Patterns can be a sign of manipulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. That's What is Suggested to Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
36. You need to clarify a few points... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. Clarified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
42. Corrected analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. "Around" 25%? Where is the calculation? Be specific. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 02:55 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. It's simple probabilities TIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:42 PM Response to Reply #50 |
61. IT'S TIME FOR YOU TO GIVE UP THE GHOST. HERE ARE THE REAL PROBABILITIES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:47 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Prove that I am wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:51 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. See post #50. I showed you that you're wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:55 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. No, you showed DU why anything you say from here on is of no consequence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:51 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. I think your oversimplifying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Deleted message |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:19 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Please don't do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:29 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. First of all, I would presume that they are numbered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Agreed, kinda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. As I showed, it really does not matter if sequentially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. Disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 05:54 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. They are not the same - they *are* lower - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 06:10 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 06:36 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. I don't think you understand how this works then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Well, I've certainly found our root problem 8) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 07:03 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 06:31 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. qwghlmian, where have you gone? I have something for you.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 06:42 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. Here - let's use your method, but try to be honest with the numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 07:03 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Ya know he's gonna say it when he comes back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 08:10 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. I agree with you in principle about factoring in both D and Rs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 08:24 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Take a big county - Dade or Brevard etc, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 08:41 PM Response to Reply #78 |
85. You originally said prob (match) = 0.1% and 1900 precincts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 08:50 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 08:59 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 10:17 PM Response to Reply #89 |
93. Get over it. You lost and Bush lost. Go to post # 90. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. Yes, sequential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. I stand corrected, and so does my memory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:53 AM Response to Reply #66 |
119. When you have all of it on a map PM me please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 04:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
71. The poster clarified my question on this .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
84. Simulation to attempt to answer this question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 08:54 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 10:09 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. I PROVED YOU WRONG TWO WAYS: BINOM FUNCTION AND 100 RANDOM NO. SIMULATIONS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:01 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Well, how did you like that little random number generator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:09 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. I can show you work of PhDs that says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 07:07 AM Response to Reply #97 |
106. Back to talking points? "Exit polls are not designed..." blah, blah, blah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 08:21 AM Response to Reply #106 |
109. "Name them"? Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:53 AM Response to Reply #109 |
129. Fine. Now a question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:34 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. What does that have to do with anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 08:00 PM Response to Reply #133 |
147. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #147 |
163. Did YOUR Phd"s SPECIFICALLY REFUTE uscountvotes.org's latest paper? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:18 AM Response to Reply #163 |
165. Did your PhDs SPECIFICALLY REFUTE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #165 |
166. Now you are really going off the wall. Your reply speaks for itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #166 |
172. ROTFLMAO - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:36 AM Response to Reply #172 |
175. I think it would be respectful to adolfo to take this to another thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #175 |
176. Deleted message |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #176 |
177. If it's pointless, why keep it going here then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #177 |
178. Deleted message |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:59 AM Response to Reply #178 |
179. So your purpose in this thread is to ridicule TIA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #179 |
180. Deleted message |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #180 |
181. Since your purpose is to ridicule... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 12:23 PM Response to Reply #181 |
182. Deleted message |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #182 |
184. What about the rest of us DUmmies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #184 |
185. Don't understand the question - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #185 |
186. The question is, do you care about anyone else? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 01:10 PM Response to Reply #186 |
187. Deleted message |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 01:13 PM Response to Reply #187 |
188. Post 175 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #188 |
189. Full circle.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #187 |
190. You asked me how amusing yourself ridiculing TIA affects others.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 01:45 PM Response to Reply #190 |
191. Instead of DUmmie, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #191 |
192. Feel free to amuse yourself ridiculing me.....have at it.. 8) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 03:53 AM Response to Reply #192 |
194. 100 simulation trials: avg 8 match/trial , prob (14 matches) = 1 in 29 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 08:07 AM Response to Reply #194 |
195. If the distribution of the ratio "votes/registration" is not normal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 09:07 AM Response to Reply #195 |
196. Normalcy test results ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #196 |
198. Link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 09:08 AM Response to Reply #194 |
197. Should be easy to come up with more twins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 10:34 AM Response to Reply #197 |
199. Simulations: 150-300 votes; 200-400 reg: prob (>=14)= 1 in 13000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 11:16 AM Response to Reply #199 |
200. Widening the range: Votes 100-300; Reg 200-600 (4 matches) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 11:19 AM Response to Reply #200 |
201. V 100-300; R 200-800: 5 matches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 11:27 AM Response to Reply #201 |
202. Votes: 100-400; Reg: 200-1200; 7 matches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #202 |
203. One last time: to show all precincts up to the first match.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iceburg
![]() |
Sat Apr-09-05 01:07 PM Response to Reply #203 |
204. If the distribution of the ratio "votes/registration" is not normal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Mon Apr-11-05 02:27 PM Response to Reply #204 |
206. I never assumed a normal distribution; it is uniform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. In each of 100 simulation trials, an avg 6 of 1900 matched to within .1% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. Sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minvis
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:35 AM Response to Reply #92 |
125. We're already doing it in Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:44 AM Response to Reply #125 |
127. You made my day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:00 PM Response to Reply #90 |
95. If you change your RandBetween to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:11 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. From 3-10, average of 6. Never once above 10. The odds are astronomical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:14 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. The "real" range of percentages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:48 PM Response to Reply #95 |
102. FYI... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI Independent
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:11 PM Response to Reply #90 |
98. Why are you doing random simulations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:24 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. I understand your point, but this is one way to show that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 05:31 AM Response to Reply #90 |
105. Simulations for 1900 with different standard deviations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 07:15 AM Response to Reply #105 |
107. OK, you have just confirmed my simulation - twice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 09:19 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 08:16 AM Response to Reply #105 |
108. eomer - it's because if you look at the original poster, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 09:20 AM Response to Reply #108 |
112. Still trying? Read Post #110.. Prob = 1.31% ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 09:58 AM Response to Reply #108 |
113. Oops, maybe I had my visor on too tight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:20 AM Response to Reply #113 |
117. Not quite.Take a look at post 116: Probability Sensitivity Analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:56 AM Response to Reply #117 |
120. OK, I looked and I'm confused about what you are saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #120 |
126. I am using the average match returned from the simulation.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #126 |
128. But we are not getting 14 matches in a sample of 1900 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. There are 1900 matched pairs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #132 |
137. I agree that that is two matches out of 1900 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 02:07 PM Response to Reply #137 |
141. Ok, lets recalc for 3800; For 6 sim. avg matches, the prob>=14 =0.36% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 02:41 PM Response to Reply #141 |
144. But you're using a rate of 6/3800. That should be 6/1900. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. Yes, but I'm not convinced that is how you should look at it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eomer
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 03:29 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. I'm thinking that the Democratic turnout and the Republican turnout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 09:09 PM Response to Reply #146 |
148. eomer, check this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:02 PM Response to Reply #148 |
150. Yet again, you fail simple math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 07:01 AM Response to Reply #150 |
158. No, the numbers are 4101 and .01 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 09:24 AM Response to Reply #158 |
159. You just cannot admit you were wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 09:35 AM Response to Reply #159 |
160. Unfortunately, when you divide one number by another, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #160 |
161. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #161 |
162. Go back to post #160. You replied too quickly... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:15 AM Response to Reply #162 |
164. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:30 AM Response to Reply #164 |
167. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:34 AM Response to Reply #167 |
168. Deleted message |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:07 AM Response to Reply #168 |
173. GLAD YOU BOOKMARKED. SO WILL I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 11:13 AM Response to Reply #173 |
174. LOL - yes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:42 AM Response to Reply #164 |
169. BUT THAT WOULD NOT BE A MATCH IN THE SIMULATION YOU CITE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:50 AM Response to Reply #169 |
171. And you still have not answered a simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #128 |
134. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:41 PM Response to Reply #134 |
136. Deleted message |
adolfo
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #113 |
122. Work in Progress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 08:58 AM Response to Reply #105 |
110. 1900 Sorted by match. Further proof 14 unlikely: Probability = 1.31% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TruthIsAll
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:18 AM Response to Reply #110 |
116. Probability sensitivity analysis: Observed vs simulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:16 PM Response to Reply #116 |
152. Okay all you math guys/gals. I can't even get close to you on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:45 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. If the probability of the "anomaly" happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:58 PM Response to Reply #153 |
154. This is where I think framing matters Q.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qwghlmian
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:10 PM Response to Reply #154 |
155. How should I put it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:17 PM Response to Reply #155 |
156. Very cute story Q...not arguing that point.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #154 |
183. Actually it is the opposite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:40 PM Response to Reply #183 |
193. This is the game as I see it..the way we are talking about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mgr
![]() |
Mon Apr-11-05 05:54 PM Response to Reply #193 |
207. The one problem is that you have more than two feet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1
![]() |
Wed Apr-06-05 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
103. Interesting; here's estimate of "swing" by country in Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #103 |
115. Might be just me, but link is dead. ..n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:12 PM Response to Reply #115 |
131. Page is down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #103 |
149. try again; it had typo htm rather than html |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sancho
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
104. Pinellas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:03 AM Response to Reply #104 |
114. Out of curiosity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sancho
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 02:19 PM Response to Reply #114 |
142. sorry, had to go to work.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:39 AM Response to Reply #104 |
118. Great work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #118 |
123. (Chi points up thread) 114 was actually meant for you... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:57 AM Response to Reply #123 |
130. Incomplete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chi
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:04 AM Response to Reply #104 |
121. Sorry, confused you with adolfo.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #121 |
151. here's estimate of swing by county in Florida, with doc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G
![]() |
Thu Apr-07-05 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
157. Is there a link to a numbered Florida precinct map |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Fri Apr-08-05 10:44 AM Response to Reply #157 |
170. PRECINCT MAPS/ADDRESSES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo
![]() |
Mon Apr-11-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #157 |
205. Distance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Sep 24th 2023, 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC