Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the GAO report on e-voting and e-counting at a glance for busy folks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 08:51 AM
Original message
the GAO report on e-voting and e-counting at a glance for busy folks
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05956.pdf

The non-partisan report issued by the US Government Accountability Office to the Congressional Committees on Government Reform and on the Judiciary in September 2005 is a very carefully worded document. Yet its implications for the next election cycle are ominous. The electronic voting and vote-counting systems currently in place are neither secure, nor reliable. Their numerous weaknesses and vulnerabilities have the potential to affect elections outcomes. (53)
The Help America Vote Act of October 29, 2002 that funded the purchase of electronic voting technology also required that states meet federally mandated improvements in voting standards. (19) By August 31, 2005, a total of $2,5 billion had been disbursed to purchase new electronic voting systems. In the 2004 elections 35% of US voters used optical scan systems and 29% cast their votes into direct recording electronic systems.
HAVA also established the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to adopt voluntary systems guidelines, to manage a national program to testing, certification, decertification, and recertification of voting systems and to maintain a clearinghouse of information on voting systems administration. The EAC was to be appointed 120 days after HAVA was enacted. It took the President a whole year to appoint the 4 EAC commissioners, who began their work in January 2004 after their Senate confirmation. Moreover, the commission received only $1.2 million in funding for its work in fiscal year 2004 and $14 million in 2005. (20)
Thus, electronic voting systems were purchased and put in place across the country prior to updating and implementing national standards for testing, assessing and improving their security and reliability. The current security provisions are vague and incomplete. The voluntary status of the guidelines also leaves states free to adopt them in whole or part, or reject them entirely. (32)
The central part of the GAO report highlights the security weaknesses and vulnerabilities of the electronic voting systems currently in place: (25-38)
Data files containing cast votes are not encrypted to protect them from being viewed and modified.
Other computer programs can access cast votes and alter them without the system recording this action in its audit logs.
Some ballot definition files can be altered on some models so that votes shown on the touch screen for one candidate could be counted for another candidate.
A regional vote tabulation computer could be accessed via a modem connection.
Using altered memory cards an optical scan system could be accessed and modified without leaving any record in the audit log.
Security examinations revealed inadequate password protections, including easily guessed passwords, or IDs usable by all supervisors.
Smart cards or memory cards are not secured on some voting systems, making them easily accessible to vote multiple times, change vote totals and produce false election results.
Reliance on telecommunications or networking services, including wireless communication, exposes electronic voting systems to risk of intrusion.
Source code information is inadequate, hard to detect or contains hidden functionality.
Current tests assess functionality, while security flaws can escape testing.
System failures and malfunctions during elections have led to polling place disruptions, disenfranchised voters and vote-counting errors.
Because of poor version control of software, uncertified software was installed in California and Indiana.
Although there is no consensus about the pervasiveness of these problems, if the security weaknesses and vulnerabilities of the electronic systems currently in place are exploited, changes in election results could go undetected. (38) There is evidence that these weaknesses and vulnerabilities have caused problems with recent elections, resulting in the loss and miscount of votes. (38)
In its conclusion the GAO report states that national initiatives are under way to improve voting system security and reliability, but it also warns that important initiatives are unlikely to affect the 2006 elections, due, at least in part, to delays in appointment of EAC commissioners and in funding the commission. (52) Until then, the voting systems that by many state and local jurisdictions rely on for their elections, not deserve the trust placed in them by the electorate.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05956.pdf


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Firenze777 Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. thanks for extracting that information
I intend to share it with the previously brain dead folks in my red state....I think the tide is turning and this is not so 'out there' anymore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. The 'Puke Congress will get right on fixing these problems so the voting
in future elections will be accurate and can't be tampered with or otherwise manipulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the GAO quick guide n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. kick
thanks texpatriot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow...you are a lifesaver. I needed this info this weekend and breaking
it out into Talking Points like you did is just what I was looking for.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. GAO fails to discuss evils of secret vote counting (outside its scope)
Edited on Sat Nov-05-05 03:36 PM by Land Shark
But would have been appropriate to give a nod to the idea that secret vote counting that presently takes place on trade secret corporate hard drives is anathema in a real democracy, and a huge opportunity for corruption.

But a good report nonetheless. Kicked and nominated (on edit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. On Greatest page now for people to disseminate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. thanks everybody
Ploughing through the report took a while, but I hope the digestion can be useful for dissemination.
Land Shark, I would not say that the authors of the GAO report, David Powner & Randolph Hite, don't deal with secret proprietary source code/s, they don't dwell on it. My summary could be more explicit on that important point.
"Reviewers also found that values used to encrypt election data (called encryption keys) were defined in the source code." (26)
"<...> computer security experts warn that the documentation requirements for source code are not sufficient for code that is obscure or confusing" (33)
Also contact info:
"Should you have any questions about matters discussed in this report, please contact Dave Powner at (202) 512-9286 or at pownerd@gao.gov or Randy Hite at (202) 512-3439 or at hiter@gao.gov " (57)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you. Nice work.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. you're welcome bleever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks indeed; I have friends to send it to
One in particular is a member of a church group that shares our concerns about the direction our country is headed in. I've started sending her some of the articles from Jim Wallis's Sojourners (sojo online), and have referred her to Black Box Voting online too.

I'll be passing along this information!

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Hi Hekate
I like your name. Glad the summary is useful. The gao report gives us a golden opportunity to help push the issue above ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks, freedomfries.
Just to clarify -- those numbers like (53) --

are those page numbers from the GAO report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 21st 2019, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC