Reply #7: You know, the definition of pornography isn't so black-&-white as most suppose, but I bet theteacher

[patrice]

would aggressively prevent all kinds of quasi-pornogrpahic stuff in class presentations, because s/he likely has a prejudice against it, material which could actually be legal under the first amendment. However, s/he let her/his class be assaulted by this clear demonstration of poor-taste anyway, despite people's very possibly deeply held personal values, likely because, unlike borderline pornography, s/he agrees with this value perspective and hence allowed propaganda in his/her classroom. And it IS propaganda, because his/her very probable rejection of quasi-pornographic presentations negates 1st amendment defenses and would, thus, prove that it was propaganda.