Reply #57: Both Misrata and Benghazi would have been long (and

[Fool Count]

with very low casualties) at peace without the NATO intervention. The intervention is the only reason they are still fighting and
causing death and destruction to the city. As with every example of double-speak, the results are exactly the opposite of
the declared goals. That's like almost an indication for them that everything is going according to plan. It's like they are
actually using the book as a manual: war = peace, killing people = protecting civilians, regime change = democracy,
bombing = humanitarian assistance, band of terrorists = people. What the hell did those pissants have to destroy perfectly
livable and functional country for? Democracy?