You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #68: not Chernobyl yet [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
divvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
68. not Chernobyl yet
I agree that comparisons to Chernobyl are premature. It isn't as bad as Chernobyl in terms of contamination spread... yet. I wouldn't be inclined to say that it couldn't get that bad, but it isn't yet and I hope it won't be. Nobody has died... I don't think we know the worst possible scenario... there has never been a spent fuel pool in this condition before and I haven't seen or heard any analysis of this scenario. The fuel in the reactors have not breeches their pressure vessels, yet. xxxx There is a wind shift coming. Areas north of the site may be in the fallout plume... a city of 1 million. I think that the radiation fallout that they see will tell us a lot about the severity of this problem for people outside the Japanese evacuation zone. I don't know how long it will take to fill a single fuel pool with those water cannon, but I wonder why they are only doing one at a time. Can't they get more of those fire trucks? xxxx I think I heard that U5 and U6 share a pool, so there are 5 pools that are hot and have low water levels. Even the best possible outcome for this accident is going to require a long time to get these Units in a safe and stable state. The cleanup or decommissioning could take decades. Some kind of structure will have to be built over the fuel pools... the ones with too much radiation to fly over. Hopefully, we will see a big dose reduction as the pools are refilled. New spent fuel cooling and demineralizer systems will probably have to be installed. My guess is that new systems will be easier (and lower dose) to install than repairing the current ones. The reactors would have to have functioning level control, feedwater makeup, and core cooling. The site would need normal off-site power restored and new or repaired emergency generators (tsunami proof this time). Even when things are under control, there is a lot to do... to really end the emergency. The 50 heroes are dedicated to keeping water in the 3 reactors that were running. Engineers should be working on designs for the necessary fixes. Another team should be looking at U4-6 and making sure those reactors are stable. Without core cooling, they won't stay that way forever. Another team should be trying to stabilize the fuel pools. The problems are too serious to focus on just one thing at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC