You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Does your gut clench a bit when you read about force feeding? You ain't read nutthin' yet! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-21-13 06:47 AM
Original message
Does your gut clench a bit when you read about force feeding? You ain't read nutthin' yet!
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sun Jul-21-13 07:23 AM by No Elephants
(Apologies to whichever screenwriter wrote the first line spoken in a commercial "talkie" in the US.)

Federal judges reinstate groin searches pending appeal


Past practice of shaking a captives trousers to see if nails, shanks, ragged scraps of metal fall out posed an unacceptable risk to the safety and security of detainees and guards, Kelly said.

Last week, detainee lawyers persuaded U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth that the invasive searches, adopted amid a widespread hunger strike, were discouraging some of Guantnamos 166 captives from voluntarily leaving their cells for meetings with their lawyers. Lamberth ordered the guards to stop it, and resume the practice of physically shaking the waistband of the pants of a prisoner to see if any contraband comes out.


Doesnt the government have more important things to do than defend its right to grope detainees? said attorney David Remes in Washington. In London, detainee attorney Cori Crider* called the searches a transparent effort to break the hunger strike and to staunch the flow of information about it to the outside world.


The groin searches were reinstated, at least temporarily, by a three-judge panel two appointed to the court by George W. Bush and one by Bill Clinton while the appeals court considers whether to overturn Lamberths order. A preview of the appeal, in the Justice Departments bid for a stay, said the searches were justified because the military has this year found dangerous materials and other contraband in cells at the prison.

Read more here:

Read more here:

I am dying of curiosity: How is a groin search less dangerous to a "detainee" (odd word for life imprisonment) than simply shaking the waisband of his trousers? Exactly how were the guards shaking waistbands that made that procedure so dangerous? And, if they did find a way to make shaking waistbands dangerous to the detainee, just imagine how dangerous to the detainee they can make a groin search!

America, America,

God shed His grace on thee

And crowned thy good with brotherhood

From sea to shining sea!

Pop quiz:

1. In which ways is Holder's D of J superior to Gonzo's?

2. When did the federal judiciary decide to rubber stamp the USG?

Seems as though Obadmin will go through a lot of changes to protect its image.

Remember when Obama ran on closing Gitmo and we thought that would be good news for the "detainees?"

Good times.

BTW, Obama issued an executive order prohibiting release of "detainees" to Yemen. Odd, since most of those "detained indefinitely" despite having been cleared of any and all crimes, are from Yemen.

On the bright side for the Obamadmin, the number of indefinite detainees who are on hunger strike decreased sharply during Ramadan, even though the word was that force feeding during Ramadan would be totally consistent with religious fasting requirements (that would be nothing, even water, by mouth or vein until after sundown, when Muslims literally breakfast during Ramadan--qauite a feat in desert nations).

*Radio interview of Attorny Crider on the subject of forced feedings:
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC