You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Jon Keller is repulsive and the Warren campaign should never have allowed him to moderate. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-12 12:09 AM
Original message
Why Jon Keller is repulsive and the Warren campaign should never have allowed him to moderate.
Advertisements [?]
I mentioned local Boston political commentator Jon Keller in connection with his being the moderator of the first Warren-Brown debate.

Thanks to the reddening of PBS during the Bush years, the late Andy Rooney's daughter, Emily Rooney, has at least two shows on WGBH, our main public broadcasting channel. One of them involves a panel discussion to which Jon Keller was added in recent years.

The panel was discussing the charges about the host of a children's show on BBC having allegedly molesting hundreds of children during his career on the BBC.

Here was Keller's first comment. (Italics indicate where he lowered his voice to a barely audible level and spoke very quickly and bold indicates where he raised his voice to a near shout.)

"The Boy Scouts, the Catholic Church, the BBC, some of our (in the case of the BBC) most progressive institutions.

First of all, what makes the BBC a progressive organization in the context of England as a whole? If anything, it's probably relative conservative.

Second, the BBC was only one of the three organizations he named. The majority of the three are decidedly conservative, at least in the U.S.

He does craven, dishonest things like that all the time.

As you may recall, I reported that his very first question in this important first debate was about Warren's alleged Native American heritage, which he framed in terms of a character issue. And then let Scott Brown pound that issue, which had at that point, been Brown's biggest charge against Warren, until the first break.

Had I been in the Warren campaign, I would never have agreed to him as a moderator, certainly not of the first debate.

Contrast that with the Brown campaign, which flatly turned down the Kennedy Senate Center as a debate venue unless Vicki Kennedy would agree not to endorse Warren.

Democrats always congratulate themselves on being so much smarter than Republicans. I certainly believe that Warren is smarter than Brown. But, when it comes to organization building and strategy, I have to hand it to Republicans. Sadly, I also have to hand it to Republicans when it comes to "the Southern strategy" and dirty tricks.

I guess forty years of Democratic control of Congress (thank you Franklin, Eleanor, Jack, Lyndon, New Deal, New Frontier and Great Society)made them desperate. And spiritually downright ugly.
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC