You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #72: More non-responsiveness. The "dots" of fact-based history have all been "connected" by legitimate [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. More non-responsiveness. The "dots" of fact-based history have all been "connected" by legitimate
scholars, and they confirm precisely what I stated above:

1. President Kennedy was an unrepentant, proud Cold Warrior and strong supporter of the so-called "military industrial complex" (into which he pumped billions of dollars through America's national defense apparatus) to the day he died, and...

2. In his last set of delivered remarks in Fort Worth he spent most of it pointing to his record as not only an aggressive Cold Warrior, but also bragging to high heaven about how much his administration has increased defense spending, and the deployment of troops to South Vietnam ("600 percent!" he proudly points out at one point), and...

3. Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone and with malice aforethought, did assassinate President Kennedy in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963, immediately following this speech.

These facts are undisputed, and remain so, despite your continued attempt to obfuscate and change the subject.

I say again: why won't you address the specific remarks he gave in his last freakin' speech on earth wherein he openly and effusively brags about having pumped billions of dollars into the so-called "military industrial complex"? Where he talks about holding the line against the communists in South Vietnam, among other places?

To ask the question is to answer it, and is why you continue to evade & duck answering those specific questions about that specific speech.

Which is in and of itself a roundabout way of conceding that I am right, and you are wrong. Very well: concession accepted. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC