You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #98: The number in 2004 in a study in the NEJM put the conservative number at [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #47
98. The number in 2004 in a study in the NEJM put the conservative number at
278 per day or over 100,000 per year and the authors admit that those numbers only include the cases that were admitted/documented and also didn't include those number of people who would have refused to go to the hospital in the first place due to worry over the cost and bills.

Here's a few facts about the USA system:

It is still the number one reason for foreclosure and has been the number one stated reason for foreclosures for decades. The NEJM published a study comparing access to emergency and specialists in north america and a few other key industrialized countries of similar size and diversity which have private health care delivery models. In terms of ER wait times and the amount of time it takes to see a specialist for life threatening conditions the USA scored below everyone I. The study. What purposed the authors was that Canada outscored us significantly on both of these markers despite paying less per capita, having higher overall operating costs, and fewer per capita ratios of specialists to patients. That's right, in Canada it takes less time to see a specialist or an ER doc and it costs half what it does us and everyone is in line.

I doesn't surprise me the a certain cat doesn't get this despite posting on health care posts regularly and despite others explain over and over while providing link after link showing how expensive, inefficient, and cruel the USA 1%er system is. It's either deliberately obtuse, diabolically devilishly advocative, or decidely and perhaps remuneratively shillic. Take your pick. The other theory I have is traumatic brain injury leading to a loss of short term memory encoding..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC