You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #81: So we're just imagining that the judge ruled against her? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. So we're just imagining that the judge ruled against her?
Edited on Tue Jun-28-11 11:06 PM by Pithlet
Yes, the fact that those red marks are mentioned, and the fact that there is an actual judgment (not to mention she already lost custody, which means it's likely this isn't even the first incident) makes the likelyhood that those marks were significant pretty likely. I don't think it's a wild jump to conclusions that there was actual evidence that led to a judgment against her. You're free to disagree. But it's a little nutty to think it's a wild jump to conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC