You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: Maybe. I also don't understand how that original count is documented [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Maybe. I also don't understand how that original count is documented
Edited on Tue May-03-11 10:25 AM by jsamuel
and what would be involved in tampering with that. I don't want to go too far into my ideas of what might have happened unless and until there is a much more significant number of anomalies. There is certainly an argument to be made that it just seems like an awful lot of work to rig it that way. But then again, how many millions of dollars are being spent on elections every time?

That bag in particular may not be as big of a problem compared to the others we have seen so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC