Reply #144: What do you suppose that MEANS? I mean, aside from the obvious, i.e.

[Warren DeMontague]

there was more solid evidence to prosecute him on the Cole and Embassy bombings, and as others have noted, it's entirely possible that Bush fucked up the case re: 9-11 so badly as to make it not prosecutable. That does NOT mean he didn't do it. As shown, he ADMITTED being responsible. Not sure why that doesn't count.



So... you find it "shocking" that the FBI didn't put 9-11 on the wanted page. What, precisely, do you think this "shocking" fact implies?



And, also-- let me ask you- if he had been accused of telling someone not to smoke on the subway, instead of ordering the deaths of over 3,000 innocent people, would you find it easier to stomach an act of violence against him?

Maybe instead of bending over backwards to wiggle him into the position of innocent victim, you might say something like "I hope he learned his lesson"