You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Former Bewsh II Stooge Tony Fratto on CNBC: "Hard to Imagine Obama Re-electable" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 09:09 PM
Original message
Former Bewsh II Stooge Tony Fratto on CNBC: "Hard to Imagine Obama Re-electable"
Advertisements [?]
On the ticker.

That's funny.

1. Republican Sure Thing Ace-In-The-Hole: GO! Don't tell me "it doesn't matter who" Tony Fratboy, because it DOES.

2. The economy can double-dip and your party STILL wouldn't win 2012. Why?

Your party overreached with the whack-a-ding-dong Fascist "GOVERNORS", THAT'S why!!

Every idiot nosepicker who slobbers lovingly for Faux red meat thought they were electing a bunch of hard liners who would take from the poor and give to the middle and working class until, lo and behold, the plan all along was to screw EVERYone making less than $300,000 a year. They're pretty much getting away with it and now every one of these low-info brain surgeons, amazingly enough, has buyer's remorse, as if they didn't see this coming :eyes:

You say "this is Obama's economy to own?" WHO and WHAT ENTITY PUT him in that position? Who wasted a once semi-manageable debt into oblivion for nothing? Who shed taxes on the rich that resulted in ZERO job growth for 10 years? And we're going to put THAT element back IN the White House and the Senate because of a bad month of job creation? Shouldn't you be blaming this on your handlers for selfishly holding back even though taxes are at a decades-long-LOW for them (like they pay the full percentage anyway)?


Got news for you: Unless your guy or gal sleeps with the Ditz-lamic TeaHad, they ain't getting the nomination. And if they do that, they lose the fence sitters, independents and moderates. Even if "false Christian" Mittens gets in, they lose the fundies and the nutters.

So how do you propose your loser party with it's loserish "scorch-the-Earth" candidates even has a fly-speck of a chance in hell of winning in 2012?

If this is what passes for intellect in the GOP, I'd hate to see their dumb ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC