Reply #48: My what a cute little tantrum you are having.

[phleshdef]

First off, no one is saying Goldman Sachs shouldn't be investigated over this damn scheme they pulled. That has ZERO to do with this thread.

This post was in response to other threads being posted here last night that insinuated that Moore was calling for an investigation because of GS contributions to the Obama campaign. If Michael Moore didn't actually mean that and I had it wrong, thats great. Unlike a lot of people here, I have no problem admitting that I got something wrong. Its easy.

Regardless, that changes NOTHING regarding the point in my post which was refuting the notion that there was significant influence from Goldman Sachs on the Obama campaign. Others were in fact trying to make that argument. If you missed those other threads, my apologies. I didn't mean to get you all cooked up into a tantrum over nothing. You should probably save your teeth gritting, chest beating, "deal with it" faux-righteous indignation for someone else.