Reply #174: Continue dodging the truth then

[DirkGently]

Which is that your "question" is rhetorical nonsense. It's a illogical, unsupportable tactic which for some reason you believe you can use to defend BP as the most qualified to run the cleanup of the disaster it caused through its own greed and incompetence. Which again, doesn't survive even the most basic logical analysis. Again, you don't leave the arsonist in charge of firefighting pending a full investigation as how fires could better be suppressed. You throw the bum out and do whatever you need to, but you do it with someone who isn't both conflicted about putting out fires and clueless as to how to go about it.

You have no basis to demand a solution to BP's disaster from anyone here, while hilariously giving BP a pass on the same question. What is *BP* going to do all of a sudden that works? Why should we trust the same impotent boobs that caused this, who clearly haven't the slightest idea what they're doing? Who in the world would be LESS qualified?