You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #158: Sorry Pro, didn't try to be disagreeable. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MikeMc Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #119
158. Sorry Pro, didn't try to be disagreeable.
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 07:05 PM by MikeMc
I appreciated your SSA link, so I recommended it twice in posts. I was just telling Ham that the link in your post (#82) showed how employees (all American citizen employees) pay Federal Unemployment Insurance tax. It seemed a big find for me, since I've been saying this in posts on this site, about 6 times. I was telling him that Title VIII, on the SSA link you posted, defined the fact that American workers pay for the 6 following programs with payroll deductions:

"The Social Security Act (Act of August 14, 1935)
An act to provide for the general welfare by establishing a system of Federal old-age benefits, and by enabling the several States to make more adequate provision for aged persons, blind persons, dependent and crippled children, maternal and child welfare, public health, and the administration of their unemployment compensation laws"

I only had a minor disagreement with your post 82, because I felt semantically that Manny G. was right with 'pension' more than you were with 'entitlement'. My post 95:

" 'Entitled to receive' in section 202 makes it seem like a Frank Luntz style 'entitlement', but it is an 'old age benefit payment' that Title VIII makes clear is paid for by all employees, then paid to an employee after 'the age of 65' (upon retirement). Which sounds suspiciously like a pension."

So I liked Manny's OP, and disagreed with your 'entitlement'. I swear I didn't mean to be disagreeable with you, I undertake to never praise Manny's viewpoint, through words, on any more of his original posts, in order to apologize further for my disagreeability.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC