You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: I agree with removing the cap with one caveat [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #35
56. I agree with removing the cap with one caveat
It should be at a reduced rate that reflects that they do not get benefits on that additional payment. Right now the $50K to $105K folks carry the weight of Social Security. Those below $50K actually do better actuarially by contributing to Social Security. Those above about $50K, because of the reduced benefit funding formula, do worse. You don't want really high incomes to be calculated into the funding formula because that would cause too many distortions. To expect those making $50 to $105K to carry the load alone is ridiculous.

I would be careful with additional means testing of Social Security. I think you want to encourage individuals to save for retirement. Frankly at some point on penalizing me for my 401k money, I will decide to stop working earlier and draw down that money to avoid this needs testing. With a spouse or a roommate, I calculate that I could have a survivable retirement even without my savings. I would rather have my freedom at an earlier age than be penalized for being thrifty my entire life.

Everyone should be in the system starting with their first paycheck. No one should be excluded. The way the funding formula works (approx. 90% benefit calculation on incomes up to $10K) you can game the system for a pretty nice retirement check. Some ratios to consider (assuming 35 years of earning at the same level calculated and 6.2% withholding by you and your employer):

Those making up to $9132 20.7% of yearly benefits/payments
Those making up to $55032 9.6% of yearly benefits/payments
Those making up to $106,800 6.6% of yearly benefits/payments

That last group probably also falls under pseudo needs testing (taxing Social Security benefits).

In general you cannot impact your Social Security check after you have 35 years of good earnings.

Note you could make $32,000 for 10 years on S.S. and be entitled to a check the same size as someone who worked 35 years at $9100. Makes sense to retire from a system outside of Social Security at 55 and get that Social Security job until retirement. The payback is huge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC