Reply #134: As I said, you are very invested in your POV and nothing anyone says is likely to change it.

[laughingliberal]

With the Pentagon given the authority to determine how findings are determined or even IF they conduct the investigations, I don't see how an order from the CIC would be subject to judicial review. They didn't 'dare' address it because it's not relevant.

Whether the lead author now supports repeal by legislation or not is moot. It does not change the findings. He may well believe it's a better idea, now, but it does not change the facts.

There were experts on Rachel's show last night, which we've established you could not be bothered to watch, who have had military practice. But watching it and hearing them doesn't fit your strategy to just keep defending the President's reticence to act.

Calling action by the President to stand up for civil rights 'stupid' pretty much tells me everything I need to know.

Your mind is made up as is mine. This is fruitless.