Reply #18: None of that proof supports any shooter other than Oswald.

[jobycom]

Not one bit of it. The forensics, the science, the documents... It's all conclusive. Oswald was the shooter. Looking both ways before crossing the street doesn't prove otherwise.

There are sub-governments, and private companies that function as governments, and they plot and steal and kill, and there were people who were connected to these clandestine groups who benefited greatly from Kennedy's death. Some probably wanted him dead. Some may have even plotted to have him killed. But Oswald killed him. The bullets, the trajectories, the witnesses, the video tape, the geography, the physical evidence... they are incontrovertible. Oswald did it.

Now I wouldn't be stunned to learn others knew he was going to, or even hired him to do it. I doubt it--it just doesn't fit his personality, but it wouldn't surprise me. You can't prove a negative, so you can't prove someone else wasn't involved. Ralph Yarborough used to say he was certain Oswald was the lone gunman, but when asked if he thought someone put Oswald up to it, he always refused to answer. If there's a conspiracy that's where it is. If there's a conspiracy, then someone hired Oswald to do the shooting, or at least knew about it. But Oswald was the lone shooter.