You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: The answer I believe [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. The answer I believe
is they take genes that are not in the selective gene pool of the plant and insert them in the plant. If you read Darwins book I think you'll find he considers breeding part of the evolutionary process. Evolution cares not if the selective force is "natural" or man-made. Selective breeding generally has to work with the natural gene population of a species. Waiting for new mutation in a population that are favorable to you takes a long time. For most of these new genes to arise naturally in these plants would require a huge amount of mutation of the genome and thus are very unlikely to occur. So in that sense there is a huge difference in selective breeding and current GMO methodology. But unless genetic markers are used there is little ability to tell the difference from a man introduced gene and any other gene. They are generally made of the same stuff.

The general fear is that the genes transferred between species will have unintended consequences. Such as an antifreeze gene might make your crop more frost resistant, but might prove toxic as it concentrates up the food chain. There is a general distrust that these situation have been adequately thought out and researched. The same problem of course could occur from selective breeding more frost resistant crops.

The other general dislike of these crops is that they are often made to be non-reproductive. Thus making the farmer unable to make his own feed stock and producing a heavy dependence on the manufacturer for seed.

and lastly it is a mistake to believe people aren't also unhappy with selectively breed crops. Many feel modern agricultural crops have been selectively breed at the expense of nutritional content and taste. Leaving many to be unsatisfied with modern produce in general. You see a lot of those type of posts on the DU as well.

So to sum up. Safety isn't places only on GMO or "natural" but on how it effects the ultimate environment. There is a general fear that modern crops were produced to satisfy maximum production and maximize profits, but not to maximize health or minimize environmental impact. That clearly leaves a lot of DU posters uneasy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC