You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Movie studios appeal against iiNet piracy ruling [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 05:36 AM
Original message
Movie studios appeal against iiNet piracy ruling
Advertisements [?]
Source: Sydney Morning Herald (Oz)

Hollywood film studios today lodged an appeal against a landmark legal judgment which found an Australian Internet provider was not responsible for illegal movie downloads by its customers.

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), representing a consortium of 34 studios, said the Federal Court's ruling was out of step with well-established copyright law.

"The court found large scale copyright infringements (proven), that iiNet knew they were occurring, that iiNet had the contractual and technical capacity to stop them and iiNet did nothing about them," said Neil Gane, executive director of AFACT.

"In line with previous case law, this would have amounted to authorisation of copyright infringement."

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/movie-studios-appeal-against--iinet-piracy-ruling-20100225-p4vx.html



The original ruling against the studios was based, as I recall, on the finding that the third-party internet provider had no legal duty to enforce the movie studios copyright, nor even a duty to inform the government of a suspicion of such infringement.

Not that a government would undertake to defend a particular copyright - that being the responsibility of the copyright holder; though a government might well undertake to defend the rights of copyright in general. Or might, as in China, choose to ignore such rights.

Certainly the Australian government could, if it wished, and as it may, impose such duties - but these duties do not exist now, any more than the local library is required to make certain that patrons are not in violation of copyright law when making photocopies in the library.

Beyond question, the movie studios copyright was infringed, and, also beyond question, they have the legal right to pursue those who violated the copyright. Equally beyond question though is that this violation was not by the ISP, though the ISP clearly must have been aware of the copyrighted material passing through its servers.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC