You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: I can't agree more, TwixVoy. Obama would have to make some [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-17-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. I can't agree more, TwixVoy. Obama would have to make some
Edited on Sun Jan-17-10 09:24 AM by Nay
serious and surprising reversals, and be able to demonstrate them nightly on TV, for anyone to have any hope that things were really changing. As many before me have said, a Pub president with majorities like Obama has would have rammed any old program they wanted down the throats of the Dems and the American public -- that's exactly what happened with that moron Bush. What does this tell us? It tells us that our government is not really our government -- it's the pretty face of the real government, which consists of the oligarchs/corporations.

Now, this view has some distressing problems. What use is it to keep electing Dems, if they are secretly already in the corp camp or are easily seduced or threatened to join? Lieberman should have gotten the back of Obama's hand -- not an olive branch. Geithner/Bernanke/Summers should have been nowhere near the Obama admin. Both wars should have been winding down right about now. Just getting rid of the wars would have boosted Obama into the stratosphere -- even the dumbest pub knows in the back of his mind that they were stupid and that they are eating up resources needed here at home in our economic struggle. Howard Dean should occupy a position of honor and power in DC, but he has been sidelined. People like Grayson are allowed to hang around to bolster the impression that there is a real debate, but if he got too powerful he'd be Wellstoned.

As far as the healthcare bill: why are we screwing around with that when we have so many other immediate improvements that, once done, would give Obama a near-universal approval rating that would make a Medicare-for-all bill so much easier to pass? Personally, I think the healthcare debate is a calculated distraction from things that need to be done immediately for the immediate economic survival of the nation.

All of this is simple and easy to understand and view. And people are seeing it and are angry. This will show up in the polls -- would we be better off voting Dem no matter what? Only in the short run. In the long run, we need two real parties and/or a real shakeup that reorders the whole country. Let's stop allowing the Pubs to do the shaking up with their nutty idiots like Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC