You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #32: Your stats aren't actually relevant. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Your stats aren't actually relevant.
Edited on Fri Dec-11-09 10:44 PM by Igel
The problem is in the title of the chart: ODA.

Official Development Aid.

That's a couple of rather severe restrictions on what's being counted.

That means what the government gives in overseas aid to other countries for economic and social development. It says nothing about (a) private donations and NGOs, i.e., those by individuals (which is the entire point of the OP) or (b) any spending done domestically from any source.

It's a very common assertion that a lot of others give more than Americans, but what that usually means is that the governments give more in international aid. That works when the government is essentially the only game in town, when there are few contributions within a country and not much aid is used internally, but otherwise.

There are similar kinds of skewed comparisons made. My personal favorite is always average income. Most of the reports use governments' official numbers. So in France and quite a few other countries all sorts of government aid counts as income, so the poor and unemployed receive aid for housing, aid for food, aid for medical care, etc., etc., and that counts as income. In the US earned income counts as income, so any housing aid, food stamps, EIC, Medicaid, etc., does *not* count as income. It's like comparing tangerines and grapefruits--both may be citrus, but beyond that it's a bit dicey. It always pays to look at the footnotes and endnotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC