You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #97: Bear in mind that you just called Chris Busby an ex-"industry hack" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #78
97. Bear in mind that you just called Chris Busby an ex-"industry hack"
I've seen ECRR materials that trumpet among his credentials his status as an ex-member of CERRIE - and he is one of the (small number of) scientists whose studies you support! It seemed like he was OK with being in that group until the group's conclusions diverged from his views. And Busby, "Scientific Secretary" for ECRR, has essentially distanced himself from the scientific community, preferring self-publishing to peer review according to people I'm sure will be denounced as "industry hacks" (that is to say, by scientists who do participate in the conventional peer review process). CERRIE member Richard Wakeford writes, "Chris Busby, for example, is apparently quite prepared to self-publish reports containing glaring errors in data and/or analyses; nonetheless, the findings are duly given publicity in the media, presumably a principal objective." Earlier he remarks, "Chris Busby is essentially an aspiring politician who happens to have scientific qualificationshe is the Green Partys spokesperson on science and technology and has stood for election to the European Parliamentand, in my view, his actions must be seen in this light. It would be asking too much of him to make substantial concessions on the very issue that has brought the media publicity that provides the fuel to drive a political career."

"Paranoia" is intended not so much as an insult but a description. I would use the same word to describe the stance of people honestly swayed by the global warming deniers - they, too, have to believe in a global conspiracy of the scientific community to suppress the truth because of some nefarious motive. I'll grant that some conspiracy theories are true, and not every case of belief in a conspiracy belies paranoia. But like global warming denial, this is a case where it's extremely difficult to construct believable scenarios under which so many different scientists across the globe could possibly be missing what the dissident voices say is the actual truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC