You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #176: Agreed. Sorry to be suspicious; [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
motocicleta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #174
176. Agreed. Sorry to be suspicious;
bulletin boards don't lend themselves to easy understanding of motives.

I wonder, too, how it will play out politically, and my only criticism of Edwards is that he may find himself in a strange situation if the factors I envision do occur during his presidency - quite a load of 'if's there.

At any rate, I wish our democratic leaders adhered to my sense of environmental asceticism, but I don't think too badly about them when they don't. I just couldn't help but comment on a few of the Edwards threads since they were legion.

The IWR, on the other hand, ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC