Reply #2: you mean the article

[paulsby]

that concludes the officers were rapists without even charges being filed, let alone a conviction in a court of law, where they have the right to due process, to confront their accuser, etc.

instead what you have is an article that assumes one side is telling the truth, and the other side isn't, despite the fact that the other side has the weight of a jury decision on their side, as well as physical evidence (the GPS system).

aaprently, some people are so bigoted that they can assume any cop that is accused of anything is automatically guilty, even if charges aren't filed AND the accuser is later found guilty by a jury of making false claims.

wow, how unbiased, fair minded and progressive.