You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #61: On the positive side... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
61. On the positive side...
...the economy would have to fail much worse than it has failed so far for things to be as bad, or worse, than the situation we had during the Great Depression.

A depression is characterized by a large and sustained relative drop in GDP. Our current GDP, the already economically collapsed one, could drop to fully half of what it is right now, however, and per-capita GDP would still be way better than what it was just before the Great Depression, never mind during Depression.

US GDP, 1929: $800G, in 1999 dollars
US population, 1930 (close as I could get): 123M
My calculated GDP per capita: 800G/123M ~= $6,500 in 1999 dollars, which is about $8350 in 2009 dollars.

(BTW: It's fucking hard to find any current statistics about GDP that aren't given as a percentage change from a previous year or quarter, and get at the actual fucking current value!)

US GDP, 2007: $13,800G
US GDP, 2009 (guessing about a %20 drop from 2007 about now, which is probably exaggerated): $11,000G
US population, 2009: 305M
My calculated GDP per capita: $31,400

So, we've got a lot of wealth to go around, and would still have a lot of wealth even after a much nastier decline than we've even seen. The pain comes in how sudden economic changes are so unevenly distributed. That, and it's very hard to really compare economic statistics over a span of 80 years. A lot of our increased wealth is in things like iPods, which you can't eat when you're hungry, and designer clothing, which has a marked-up value when computing GDP, but it doesn't necessarily keep you warmer in the cold of winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC