You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Really? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Really?
The OP article claims that intensive factory farming causes flu pandemics.

How do you account for the 1918 flu epidemic, which was H1N1, and like this one, a virus which with multiple inclusions from avian and swine virus strains?

In recent times, there have been about 3 flu pandemics a century. Flu is suspected to have caused epidemics in earlier times, but cannot of course be confirmed:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1894950,00.html

This seems to be more of a natural cycle, and it seems to have predated modern farming techniques. The frequency of pandemics hasn't increased so far as we know. And since pigs easily get both avian and human flu, they do serve as a mixing vessel for viruses. But actually, modern intensive farming probably offers less mixing of fowl and pigs than the more traditional small homesteads that usually kept fowl and pigs.

Yeah, sure, on the face of it the theory advanced in the article makes sense, but where's the evidence? There were 3 flu pandemics in the 1700s, 3 in the 1800s, and 3 in the 1900s. In the 1990s it was proven that avian flu could pass from wild birds to domestic fowl and directly to humans. In one of the European outbreaks they traced over one thousand people who tested positive for antibodies for a straight avian virus.

There's another theory which is that this mixing occurs all the time, but pandemics only break out when the population has lost enough immunity to make it possible. That would account more easily for the level incidence of pandemics observed over centuries. As it is, the authorities are guessing that senior citizens now will have far more immunity to this virus than younger people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC