11. Well, you're dead wrong with that assertion and in fact your entire post is off base
The qualifier lies in the statement he was responding to and its something you omitted. You weren't the only one who watched the argument and anyone who did watch it knows that you aren't providing the comment in the context it was presented and it is unreasonable for you to take that comment out of that context. In fact the colloquy what was taking place dealt with both the questions of had this happened in the past and would/should/could it happen again in the future.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
