Reply #67: Thank you! I'm not the only one.

[Pithlet]

I was really trying in that thread to get that across. He's trying to distort the cause, and make it look like big, bad evil DUI laws that have to be stricken from the books. But it really is just this distorted agenda piece. I could see no concrete evidence anywhere in that article that the problem was DUI laws, and that they're just this egregious constitutional violation. Of course, we have to be constantly vigilant in protecting our rights. On that I have no doubt, and our justice system is flawed. There's no reason to twist that fact into agenda to get rid of perfectly good laws that actually do do some good.