You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #144: Good point. Check this out - the tape of the Social Workers restraing order hearing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #122
144. Good point. Check this out - the tape of the Social Workers restraing order hearing

Right now, there's just the word of the social worker. The July 24th date where she reported these threats is interesting. She had to see herself in imminent danger to break confidentiality and do that.
I'd like to know more about that.

There was reference to group therapy. ... just found this.

The NYT got a 10 minute recording from the hearing that

(Describing early morning voice messages from Ivins)

Duley: The first voice message was sort of a ranting, blaming me for having this done to him. It was sort of just rambling.

Same with three minutes later, saying that obviously we no longer have a therapeutic relationship, and how could I do this to him.

NYT Tape of restraining order hearing:

"(Describing a July 12 call)

Duley: That one was rather scary. He very calmly thanked me for ruining his life and opening, allowing the FBI now to be able to prosecute him for the murders and that it was all my fault, and it's going to be my fault that they could now get him.


Duley: As far back as the year 2000, the respondent has actually attempted to murder several other people, either through poisoning he is a revenge killer when he feels that he's been slighted or has had, especially towards women, he plots and actually tries to carry out revenge killing. He has been forensically diagnosed by several top psychiatrists as a sociopathic, homicidal killer..."

This is odd.

Why was he still on the job if "top psychiatrists" said he was a homicidal killer..."?

Why wasn't he restrained in a psychiatric facility based on this testimony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC