You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #6: More from Warren on "income volatility" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. More from Warren on "income volatility"
In 1970, a family needed 52 paychecks (one income) to meet all its bills, including fixed expenses.
In 2004, a family needed 104 paychecks (two incomes) to meet these same bills.

Unemployment: In a two income family, there is theoretically twice as much of risk of unemployment occurring as in a one income family. While the two-income family will have some money coming in (about half), it still may not be able to meet its mortgage or fixed expenses. In a 1970's one-income family, there is another person (usually the wife) who can go out to work in her husband's place temporarily. She would not make what he does, but the fixed expenses are lower and they have a better chance of at least making the mortgage.

In other words, the two-income family carried inherently MORE risk than the one income family, considering the whopping fixed expenses of our times.

This is all BEFORE taking into account job volatility, the stability of workers' jobs. In 1970, the stability of jobs was far stronger, and there was far less likelihood of losing a job. In 2004, jobs are much more unstable and there is far more of a likelihood of losing a job (per person).

Hence, our current two-income families are actually LESS stable because of current market conditions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC